The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1525 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I think that it was £56 million, as part of the emergency budget review in 2022.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I want to better understand some of the figures. Perhaps Mr Gray can help. What has the £56 million been used for so far? That was allocated back in 2022, so what has happened to the £56 million?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Monica Lennon
Again, thanks for reminding us about the context in which we discuss these matters; we know that there are many challenges. You have talked about the methodology and the importance of transparency in budgeting—being able to look line by line and see the impact. The Government’s original commitment was to use the ScotWind money to tackle the climate and nature emergency, not to deal with the NHS or public services more generally. Given that my original question was about your level of confidence to meet interim 2030 and 2045 emission reduction targets, are we to take away that you, today, cannot guarantee that that ScotWind money will be used for tackling the climate and nature emergency only?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Monica Lennon
No—that was very helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
Other witnesses should indicate if they wish to come in. Paul, do you want to say something?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you. Ailsa Raeburn has been waiting patiently to come in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you, Ailsa. You packed a lot in there, and I am grateful that you have put that on the record.
I will squeeze in a final question, if that is okay with the convener, because I want to cover objective 6, which is to
“Take action on the indirect drivers of biodiversity loss”.
The draft plan states that action will be taken to
“strengthen the connection between people and nature”
through
“Nature positive developments and stewardship of public, community and private land”.
I am keen to hear what nature-positive development looks like in practice, and whether we have a blueprint for that in Scotland. I see that Caroline Brown wants to come in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
We are getting the message that mapping is very important.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I am really enjoying this meeting. It is nice to be back in the Parliament. If I reflect on the early questions about engagement, I think that you have all demonstrated why we need early engagement and genuine and meaningful co-production.
My question is about objective 5, which is to “Invest in nature”. The biodiversity investment plan was mentioned earlier and the draft plan commits to developing a biodiversity investment plan that will, or should, set out strategic priorities for public investment. I am keen to understand what has been learned to date about the effective public funding of nature restoration. Where does investment need to be prioritised? Perhaps you could also say a word or two about whether current funding commitments reflect the urgency of the nature crisis that has been articulated today.
My question is for Bruce Wilson first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I am keen to bring in others, but I want to build on that by touching on the role of private investment. Bruce Wilson is right to say that that is the reality, but stakeholders have raised concerns about an apparent reliance in the draft plan on private investment approaches. Paul Walton’s points about regulation and the need for integrity are obviously key in that respect. Do you agree with the Government’s strategy of promoting responsible investment in natural capital, and what would that look like?
Moreover, the Government is, as you know, looking to expand the use of woodland and peatland codes and exploring biodiversity credits. We have also heard about some fears with regard to potential greenwashing, particularly with some of the big polluters. I know that Sarah Cowie wants to come in, but I also want to come back to Bruce Wilson on that question and, indeed, am keen to hear a range of views, if there are any.