The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1508 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you for the time that you gave me earlier, convener. To go back to Mark Ruskell’s question, I reiterate that it is important that Scottish Water follows Fair Work Convention principles and the Scottish Government pay strategy when approaching negotiations under the recognition agreement with the three unions. I have heard a lot about there being open doors and I look forward to hearing that there have been constructive talks.
Some contracts that are awarded are worth billions of pounds—they are obviously for big projects. How do you ensure that those contracts are awarded in an open and transparent manner?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you. Bonuses have been discussed; in the different bonus schemes for the senior management team, is there any link between the bonus and any of the contracts that we have talked about being delivered under budget? Is there a link between the bonus and that outcome?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Monica Lennon
Okay, so not in 2025—was it in 2024?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Monica Lennon
Are you, as chief executive, comfortable that the really important people who do the hard work in your organisation in difficult weather all year round have the impression that you and your senior management team are anti-union and are constantly critical of the trade unions in your internal correspondence?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Monica Lennon
But surely one of the outcomes should be a happy workforce that does not have to go out on strike every year. Is that a good sign that things are going well? You talked about customer service and internal surveys, but is it a good sign that the workforce is out on strike again, having to give up a day’s wage?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Monica Lennon
Did you have legal advice to that effect?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
I will press you a little bit more on that. Although I appreciate there are a lot of different moving parts, particularly in relation to EU alignment, I would like to get a bit more clarity about when the recommendation, which dates back to 2016, will be implemented.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
It is important to get clarity on that. We know that some local authorities have queried it and asked how the new approach would interact with their role in dealing with odour nuisance complaints. For example, East Ayrshire Council has suggested that revised guidance should be provided to clarify roles. There are definitely questions about the interaction between SEPA and local authorities in relation to statutory nuisance complaints.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
I still have questions, convener. I want to ask about environmental governance, if that is okay.
One of ESS’s analytical priorities is environmental governance. Earlier in your opening statement, Dr Dixon, you referred to the Scottish Government’s governance review. You used the word “lacklustre”, so I am keen to hear more about your thinking on that.
I am also keen to know what work ESS is doing, or is planning to do, around Aarhus compliance. My understanding is that, because we do not have access to an environmental court or tribunal, because we have unequal rights of appeal in relation to our planning system and because the costs around access to justice in environmental matters are very prohibitive, people feel that they do not have routes to environmental justice. You said that what the Government is doing there is lacklustre, but what more is ESS doing to try to get some progress and compliance?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
Do you think that the Scottish Government is failing to understand that?