The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Other members might ask you further questions about that.
Finally, I turn to the aspect of the report—on which we took further evidence from Audit Scotland—about difficulties with the internal audit arrangements.
Mr Miller, you have been saying that you have told Audit Scotland what to put in its report, and that you have volunteered everything, so there is nothing of any revelation to you. Do you think that it is satisfactory that there are criticisms of the internal audit arrangements? The report talks about a number of high-risk and medium-risk areas. Can you elaborate on what they are and tell us what your disposition is on the internal audit arrangements?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
So you accept the findings.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning, Mr Bruce. During the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s inquiry, there was a very interesting comment from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman that appeared in the committee’s final report. The ombudsman said:
“We are not doing the job that we think we should be doing because we do not have the right legislative remit.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 30 April 2024; c 37.]
My question to you is this: do you think that you have the right legislative remit?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
You have surveyed the landscape of other commissions and commissioners. Do you have any sense of whether they have the right framework? Do they have adequate powers, for example?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Let me move on to some of the things that you have said in your submission. We are aware that, as you have reported, there has been a rise in demand for your services, which is constituted in part by a rise in complaints about, for example, the conduct of elected members. What measures have you implemented to ensure that your office is functioning effectively? What assessment do you carry out to ensure that you are being effective and that your impact is as you would want it to be?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
To powers?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Absolutely.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes—you have not paid a visit to the Public Audit Committee recently, which is always a good sign.
I have one final question. In the debate that is taking place about the future landscape of bodies such as yours, there has been an attempt to forge a distinction between the commissioners and commissions that are regulatory and those that have an advocacy function. In addition, distinctions are sometimes drawn between the commissions and commissioners that are proactive and those that are reactive. How would you define the work that you do? Is it regulatory only, or is there some advocacy? Is it simply reactive, or do you do proactive work as well?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Thanks very much. Good morning, Ms Vestri. On the last point that you made, to what extent is the Standards Commission regulatory only, to what extent does it have any kind of advocacy role, to what extent is it reactive—just dealing with complaints as they come through the system—and to what extent do you see your role as being proactive?