The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3630 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
The deputy convener has one final question to put to you, Auditor General. Jamie, over to you.
12:30Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes, I understand that. However, if that is the case and you all accept the findings and recommendations, why are we sitting here with a letter from the independent strategic adviser, who is also, I think, Mr McKinlay, the chair of The Promise Scotland, with some pretty harsh criticisms of the report. She says things such as that the report does not provide a
“constructive assessment of the wider landscape”,
or offer
“a realistic assessment of progress”.
That is a very harsh criticism of the report.
I do not understand how the person who chairs The Promise Scotland, who is the independent strategic adviser—presumably to the Scottish Government—has given such a damning criticism. There are two others, as well: she says that the report is not “acting as a catalyst”, and that it should “act as a catalyst”.
How do you reconcile that position, which has been expressed by the person who, among other things, is the chair of The Promise board and an adviser to the Scottish Government?
I will take Mr McKinlay first.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Colin, I think that Nicola Dickie and David Anderson want to come in on this question.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 33rd meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee.
The first agenda item is for members of the committee to decide whether to take agenda items 4, 5, 6 and 7 in private. Are we all agreed to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Mr Rennick, what is your view?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
We will get to that.
I turn to our representatives from COSLA. Do you accept the findings and recommendations of the report?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
I do not know whether you can answer this. Why was it that, when the Audit Scotland report was published, a joint press release, or a joint response, was put out by COSLA, the Scottish Government, the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives and Senior Managers—senior local authority officials—and Fiona Duncan? Does COSLA not have any differentiated analysis of what has happened, where responsibility rests and so on?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Your example of the homelessness pathway was very clear. If we have time, we will come back to your other example.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Colin Beattie, do you have any further questions?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. I will now bring this agenda item to a close and take the opportunity to thank Eva Thomas-Tudo, Rachel Browne and the Auditor General for your evidence. Some things might require to be followed up, and the committee will need to consider in due course whether it will be appropriate to get in representatives from NHS Tayside and ask them further questions.
As agreed earlier by the committee, I now move the meeting into private session.
12:32 Meeting continued in private until 12:47.