The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Earlier, you mentioned the case of the Ethical Standards Commissioner from a couple of years ago that led you to lodge in the Parliament two section 22 reports, which are, in layman’s terms, reports on when things are going wrong. Can you tell us a bit more about that and say whether earlier interventions could have been made to prevent things from getting to the stage at which you, as the Auditor General, had to lodge those reports in the Parliament?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
What should the balance be between the two?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
It will not be regulating things itself.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Would they have any powers of enforcement, for example?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you—that is helpful.
I put the same question to Colin Smyth.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
On the question about an advocacy role versus a regulatory role, what do you think the balance would likely be?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thank you
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
To go back to the question of proportionateness, I put to you the evidence that we heard from the Scottish Information Commissioner, who characterised the situation around audit as being
“a never-ending cycle of constant audit for us”.—[Official Report, SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee, 20 February 2025; c 16.]
Do you recognise that characterisation?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. In your written submission and in your answers to Lorna Slater, you referred to the Crerar review, which set out the purpose and the benefits of audit—namely:
“independent assurance that services are well-managed, safe and fit-for-purpose, and that public money is being used properly.”
Are those principles being fully applied in the case of the commissioner bodies that the committee is reviewing?