The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3231 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
I am conscious of the time, Colin. I am keen to bring in two members of the committee before we finish up.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
I will take you back to some evidence that we heard from the Auditor General about correspondence on 8 and 9 October 2015 that took place between your predecessor as chief executive of Transport Scotland and Government ministers. An email from Transport Scotland reflected Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltdâs concerns about the award of the contract to Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd. The board of CMAL went so far as to say:
âThe Board feel it is their absolute duty to point out the risk to their shareholder and in that respect would expect approval, should SG wish this project to proceed, and to receive direction to that effectâ.
The next day, a reply was submitted to Erik Ăstergaard from the director of aviation, maritime, freight and canalsâyour predecessor, Fran Pacitti. Transport Scotland used the word âauthorisedâ in relation to CMAL being able
âto enter into the Contracts and any associated documentation.â
At the bottom of that letter, it says:
âI confirm that the Scottish Ministers have considered and approved the contents of this letter.â
One of the issues that are at stake is whether written authority from ministers was sought and secured but not recorded or whether the correspondence does not constitute that at all. Mr Brannen, will you address that point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay, but in light of the view of CMAL, which also reports directly to the ministerial team, why do you not think that it was asking for written authority?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
My final question, Roy Brannen, is to ask whether it was in your gift to advise ministers to terminate the contract. If it was, did it cross your mind to do that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
You kind of recused Transport Scotland from that, but, as the accountable officer, you gave advice at the end of April 2017âit is among the 200-odd documents that are now in the public domainâin which you said that, if flexibility on the surety bond were to be introduced, you would require written authority for that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
The cost has gone from ÂŁ97 million to two and half times that much.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
Even though the First Minister had been to the yard to announce that the contract had been awarded before the negotiations were concluded.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
You mentioned paper trails. One of the big concerns that are expressed in the Auditor Generalâs report is about the lack of paper trailsâthe lack of paperworkâto cover the implications of the decision to award the contract under the circumstances that it was awarded under and the risks that that entailed. What is your reflection on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
Would it not go to a Cabinet meeting, for example?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
I am sorry, Mr BrannenâI will come to the recent correspondence between the permanent secretary and the Finance and Public Administration Committee of this Parliamentâbut you just said that the piece of paper had been found. That is not the view of Audit Scotland, is it? Its view is that the piece of paper that was found and presented to Parliament a couple of weeks ago represented more information on who. Now, you have said that it was entirely the then minister for transport. That seemed to suggest that, actually, the then finance secretary was involved in the process. However, the piece of paper that was presented does not fill the gap identified by the Auditor General, which is that there is no substantial recording of the considerations of ministers and their response to the risks that were clearly identified by CMAL in presenting the contract to Ferguson Marine.