The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3231 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
Can I pick up on that? You have already told us that you were a “proactive minister”, so I do not think that it is satisfactory to rely on a civil service draft as a reason for that letter going out, which said that the builders refund guarantee was a preference—it said that although the CMAL board had
“a preference for refund guarantees it has on occasion taken alternative approaches”.—[Official Report, 17 May 2022; c 11.]
Jim McColl told us:
“That gave us the green light to go ahead and put the resources in to put in the tender. There is a lot of work that goes into tenders and we were not going to go ahead and do all of that if we were not going to be allowed to negotiate a different form of guarantee.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 16 June 2022; c 5.]
How appropriate do you think it is, in the middle of a tender process, for you, as the minister, to send that kind of letter?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
As you know, it has taken a different view in the evidence that it has submitted to us.
I want to ask a final question before I bring in Willie Coffey. Going back to the letter of comfort and the voted loan, I think that the loan’s value was £106 million, and the value of the tender was £96 million or £97 million. Who was party to decisions about the issuing of the letter of comfort and agreeing to a voted loan of that scale?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
So you are saying that the transfer of risk from FMEL to CMAL and then to the Scottish Government would have been taken by officials, with no political sign-off.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay. We might investigate that matter a bit more deeply.
I turn to Willie Coffey.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
Colin Beattie has some questions.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
Will you briefly touch on nationalisation, Colin? I will then bring in Graham Simpson.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
In the minutes that are remaining, I want to bring in Craig Hoy briefly, and then I will ask Graham Simpson whether he has a question to put to Mr Mackay.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
Craig Hoy has some questions to put to you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
You have talked about other evidence that we have received, which you think revises the history book a little bit. In your submission to the committee you said that you were
“first aware of the guarantees issue following the selection of preferred bidder”.
However, the correspondence from February 2015 suggests that you were aware of that issue much earlier.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Richard Leonard
No. I am trying to understand whether you had to sign off the voted loan decision.