The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Sure—we will get to those.
We will get to other areas, too, but I just want to get on the record whether you accept the key messages at the start of the briefing. We will get into the criticisms from the Auditor General and the Accounts Commission in more detail later, but key message 2 says that there are
“inconsistencies and gaps in data recording.”
Do you accept that that is a deficiency in the way in which things are working at the moment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I will ask Laura Caven the same question. Does COSLA accept the briefing paper’s findings, recommendations and key messages?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
But are you the subject of audit by Audit Scotland?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
They sound very thorough. I will put the same question to Craig Naylor. As a smaller organisation—compared with the Mental Welfare Commission, for example—what is your perspective on the audit, both internal and external? Is it disproportionate? Is it overly burdensome?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is interesting, because one of the points that was put to us by the SPCB-supported commissioners was that there could be a shared audit service, rather than each organisation being audited individually. I have to say that I think that an underlying theme was the fee that those organisations pay to Audit Scotland for that pleasure. However, you are under the Scottish Government’s audit process, so you do not have a separate facility.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Julie Paterson referred earlier to the fact that your organisation has an audit, performance and risk committee. Before I come to Julie on that, do you not have something equivalent, John Ireland?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is really interesting.
I will go back to a more general theme that we have encountered in our evidence gathering so far, especially when speaking to Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body-supported commissioners and commissions and so on. Not all of them, but quite a few of them, have been grumbling. They have been grumbling because they think that the audit requirements that they are expected to comply with are, to use their terminology, disproportionate and overly burdensome.
I will start with you, Mr Ireland. I am simply trying to make a comparison. Is it the considered view inside the Scottish Fiscal Commission that you are over audited and that you are expected to do things that are surplus to what is necessary to keep in place a good assurance regime?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is really helpful. I want to tease out a little bit more the extent to which your working alongside Audit Scotland is purely voluntary and the extent to which that is provided for by the legislation—which I think that you said it is not—or through other means. Do you have a memorandum of understanding with Audit Scotland?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is interesting.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is interesting.