The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3264 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Richard Leonard
I have a couple of quick final questions. First, going back to the GFG Alliance deal, you seemed to suggest that there was no cost to the public purse and that everything was fine, but the Auditor General’s report points out that £13.5 million of Scottish Government loans were written off during 2019-2020 and 2020-21. So there has been some debt write-off there. The provision for the guarantee arrangement is valued at £114 million. I accept that that is less than it was when you sat before us last year, but it is still 300 per cent greater than it was two years ago. There are things going on, and I am sure that you will have seen the Auditor General’s comments about the volatility of the situation and how things can unravel quickly. Can you give us your views on that?
10:30Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you. For us, it is not just about the ÂŁ52 million but about the governance arrangements, the outcomes, the whole way in which it operates and whether there is any displacement effect, for example.
09:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Richard Leonard
We have quite a lot of questions to get through, and I am anxious to press the accelerator a little bit. I invite Willie Coffey to come in.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
Sorry—I can look it up in your report. I think that there were four areas in which reference was made to methodology and you looked at what could be reasonably assessed. The report states that
“the use of sample data introduces sampling uncertainty”,
so the figures are based on samples. Paragraph 1.22 in your report has four bullet points. The second point is:
“the methodology combines the calculation of PAYE and Self Assessment liabilities.”
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you. Later this morning, we will go on to talking a little more about debt collection. For now, the deputy convener, Sharon Dowey, has some questions.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
It goes back to our earlier conversation about the service level agreement and whether, if additional payment was made to HMRC, that could elicit, notwithstanding some of the methodological challenges, the kind of data that, it seems to us, would be fundamentally useful to have.
Before I bring in Willie Coffey, I raise the issue of debt collection, which, so far, has been mentioned only in the passing. Somebody mentioned the regular reporting to the Public Accounts Committee from HMRC, the NAO—of course—and other Government bodies. The UK Government’s response on the 48th report of session 2021-22 was a reflection on where things had got to with tax collection. It highlights:
“In addition, from September 2022, there will be a new contract through which HMRC places debt with private debt collection agencies (DCAs). This will allow HMRC to increase placements with DCAs by around £1 billion a year without increasing the cost to the Exchequer.”
Are those debt collection agencies doing that for free—given that it is said that there is no cost to the exchequer—or are they taking a percentage of everything that is collected, which is normally what happens in such situations? Are those agencies operational in Scotland? Are you aware of whether the Scottish Government has a view about the deployment of private debt collection agencies, and who are they, principally?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
I have something to ask before we leave this theme altogether. Paragraph 2.32 of the NAO report says:
“The tax gap is the difference between the amount of tax that should be paid and what is actually paid.”
The report goes on to say that HMRC
“does not currently produce a Scotland-specific tax gap”
and
“has limited information on total compliance activity undertaken in Scotland.”
Do the Auditor General for Scotland and the Comptroller and Auditor General at the NAO have a view on whether it would be useful to have specific Scottish tax gap data?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
On that note of great clarity, I will draw this morning’s evidence session to a close. I thank our witnesses. The evidence session has been very useful, and it provides us with a platform on which we will build.
I move the meeting into private session.
10:20 Meeting continued in private until 10:49.Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. I invite Gareth Davies, the Comptroller and Auditor General from the NAO, to make a short opening statement, after which we will move to questions.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Richard Leonard
I think that that would be helpful. One of the factors that we considered last year but which has possibly been brought more to the fore in this financial year is the rate of inflation. Inflation has led to higher wage settlements and, therefore, people’s incomes are rising. I presume that that means that the income tax take is going up. Is that a fair assessment of what is going on?