Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Filter your results Hide all filters
Displaying 3264 contributions
|
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
One of the issues that you have alluded to, and which jumped out at me from the report, was what you describe as a failure to consistently apply equality impact assessments. You have mentioned the recover, renew, transform advisory group, which I think you said included organisations such as Rape Crisis Scotland and Victim Support Scotland. Why were they not involved in equality impact assessment work? Was such work simply not carried out at all?
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Earlier, we spoke about the prioritisation of cases. When the number of hub courts went from 39 to 10, some prioritisation had to be exercised. Was there no equalities impact assessment, or was no equalities sieve applied to the prioritisation work at that point?
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Do you get a sense that that aspect is now factored in and that it will become much more of a feature of the work that is carried out?
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you. I turn to Willie Coffey, who has more questions on the Covid response.
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
We see a lot of your reports and I thought that it was interesting that your recommendations in this one are aligned with timetables. You have got things that you expect to happen within three to six months, over the next 12 months and then over the next 12 to 18 months, and I think that that is a useful way of addressing some of the challenges that you have identified. It seems to me to be quite innovative and very useful.
Have you agreed those timescales with the Scottish Government and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service?
Public Audit Committee
Decision on Taking Business in Private
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Good morning. Welcome to the 17th meeting of the Public Audit Committee in 2023. We have apologies from Colin Beattie.
The first item on our agenda is to agree—or not—to take agenda items 3, 4 and 5 in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
I will bring Willie Coffey back in now because he has more questions about some of the innovations that were developed during the course of the pandemic.
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
That concludes our questions. I thank the Auditor General, Lynsey Davies and Mark Taylor for their evidence this morning.
10:04 Meeting continued in private until 10:31.Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
There is no evidence of jiggery-pokery. I am glad to hear it.
Public Audit Committee
“Criminal courts backlog”
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Agenda item 2 is consideration of the report produced by Audit Scotland into the criminal courts backlog. I welcome to the committee Stephen Boyle, Auditor General for Scotland, who is joined by Mark Taylor, audit director and Lynsey Davies, audit manager, both from Audit Scotland.
As usual, Auditor General, we have a number of questions that we would like to put to you. However, before we do that, I invite you to make a short opening statement.
