The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The default position of the contract with FMI was secrecy, was it not? There are two paragraphs about that in the letter that you wrote to me on 4 April. The first talks about how
“all information will be treated as commercial in confidence by the parties.”
That was the condition of your contractual arrangement with FMI. The second states:
“In addition, FMI applied a disclaimer to the report which requires their consent for the report, or information contained within the report, to be shared beyond the parties to the contract.”
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Do those consultants have any exposure to risk themselves or do they just get a reward from those exercises? If things have not gone well—clearly, they have not gone that well at FMPG—does FMI assume any responsibility?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
As the saying goes, the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.
I want to tie up a few loose ends before we finish the evidence session. First, on that last point, why on earth are there any commercial confidentiality issues around the terms of reference for the study by FMI?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The Public Audit Committee deals with optimism bias a lot of the time, but, this morning, I think that we are experiencing some pessimism bias. I do not think that it is unreasonable to expect that the objective terms of reference of a piece of work that has been commissioned by the Scottish Government should be in the public domain.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Again, we will view that in light of future experience.
I turn to the other issue that we have been looking at this morning, but have not significantly dwelt on. Again, I just want to run through this as a matter of record. One of the pieces of information that you disclosed to us in February, which was quite transparent and open of you, was the EY study into BiFab. At the end of that report, EY made a series of recommendations to the Scottish Government about how it might improve things in future cases.
As we have touched on already, the report spoke about identifying
“key sectors ... of strategic importance”
that the Government ought to identify. It also said that
“SCAD should ... engage with public sector agencies”.
We have heard a little about how that goes on, although I would be interested to know whether the Scottish National Investment Bank is part of that engagement process.
I turn to three particular recommendations in that report, and I will ask you, director general, whether you have implemented those recommendations.
One was a recommendation that the Scottish Government
“should establish a standardised triage process for intervention requests”
in order to establish a “go/no-go” decision framework. Have you done that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I mean the other shipyards that are potentially in competition with Ferguson Marine for some of those contracts, for example. Is there a disclosure clause that means that you understand who else is a part of its client base, to ensure that there is no conflict of interest, for example?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
It does not work both ways, though, does it? We are sat here with hardly any information at all, all at the say-so of that overseas-owned multinational consultancy company.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. I should declare an interest. On my voluntary register of trade union interests is my membership of the GMB trade union.
It might have been better asking the shop stewards about the layout of the yard rather than spending large amounts of public money to ask FMI to provide that for you. Do you not see that there might be a conflict of interest if FMI’s clients include people who are competing against FMPG for the public procurement contracts?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. I will come back to some of those areas later on.
The deputy convener has got a short question before Graham Simpson comes in with more questions.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. We will see what happens in the future.
I turn to some of the other recommendations in the transparency review. Can I get an update from you on where you are with that? You pledged to create a web page with up-to-date information on SCAD and its work. Have you done that?