The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3264 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Richard Leonard
We are drawing towards a close, but I have just a couple of quick questions. Auditor General, you mentioned the importance of staff being listened to, and you referred, for example, to whistleblowing. However, is it not the case that staff being listened to is not just about individual whistleblowers using public interest disclosure, but that it is also about routine collective listening—for example, listening to trade unions and their health and safety forums—as well as partnership working?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Richard Leonard
I wonder about that, though, based on your experience. I was quite taken aback when the assurance board said to me and other elected representatives who were taking part in that discussion that it could be years before de-escalation takes place. Is that the sense that you get? Is it the experience that we have had with other health boards that have been escalated to level 4?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Richard Leonard
The substantive item on our agenda is consideration of a section 22 report, “The 2022-23 audit of NHS Forth Valley”. I welcome our four witnesses: Stephen Boyle, Auditor General for Scotland; Pat Kenny, associate partner, audit and assurance, at Deloitte; Rebbecca McConnachie, senior manager at Deloitte; and Leigh Johnston, senior manager at Audit Scotland.
We have a number of questions to put to you, based on the report that was produced into the performance of NHS Forth Valley but, before we get to those, I invite the Auditor General to give a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you. Graham Simpson wants to come in with a question in that area.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Richard Leonard
So it is not a function of, for example, the level of vacancies or of a particular sickness absence rate in NHS Forth Valley.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Richard Leonard
May I pick you up on your language? You describe it as “rightsizing”, but, in the case of Scottish Enterprise, is it not downsizing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Yes. Right.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Forgive me, but my reading of what you are saying is that reform equals contraction and rightsizing equals downsizing.
Before I bring in Graham Simpson, I have just one question that I hope is straightforward and which will elicit a quick answer. Currently, there are no public sector pay guidelines. They were not part and parcel of the fabric of the budget presented to Parliament. Can we expect to see public sector pay guidelines being issued?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you. That would be helpful.
I will take us back to the substantive report that we are discussing, which is the Auditor General’s section 22 report. I want to get your position on the record, permanent secretary. Paragraphs 95 and 96 are the conclusion of the report. Paragraph 96 carries a series of five clear recommendations from the Auditor General about a change of approach and development of approach, and so on, with regard to accessibility and transparency; governance and assurance arrangements; the public sector estate; a road map of what the design and delivery of public services, which we have already spoken about this morning, looks like and how you will advance that; and a timetable for completion, as a matter of urgency, of the whole-of-Government accounts, which we will get to shortly.
Do you accept the conclusions and recommendations in that paragraph of the report?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Okay. I will move on to another quick question about the strategic commercial assets division. Do you consider the Petroineos oil refinery at Grangemouth to be a strategic commercial asset?