The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2024
John Mason
Thank you. Convener, if there is time at the end, I might come back to that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
It was just in your opening comments.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
If the Parliament is considering the appointment of a new commissioner, the Government will give its view and everyone else will give their views, whereas, if the Government is proposing a new commissioner, it is primarily the Government that will drive the proposal.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
I accept all of that.
You have also stressed the independence of SPCB bodies. Do you think that they are more independent than, for instance, Government commissioners? People such as His Majesty’s chief inspector of constabulary and His Majesty’s chief inspector of prisons are seen as being quite independent. Is there a difference from the public’s point of view?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
Are the ones that were set up by the Government, or which operate under the Government, scrutinised? Can you say anything about how they are scrutinised within Government or the civil service?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
A related question is who will lead on any change and take it forward. You seem to be indicating that the Government would not lead on, say, giving the SHRC more clout if we went down that route. In that case, who should lead on it? It is easy to say that it should be the Parliament, but Parliament is made up of 129 of us, and we all look in different directions. Does the Finance and Public Administration Committee need to drive the issue forward?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
You come across as fairly relaxed about having a few more commissioners.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
Following on from some of my colleagues, I note that you have already stressed that it is for the Parliament to decide on new commissioners, and the Government will have a voice in that, albeit just one voice among others.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
One of our witnesses said that it was independence of thought that mattered most, more than whether a body was a Government body, a Parliament body or something else.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
John Mason
I get that, but I was taken by your phrase “set the tone”. It is a good one, and I think that a public statement about restricting the number of commissioners would send a message more widely.
A number of witnesses suggested that the Scottish Human Rights Commission could be strengthened and expanded and that, instead of our having lots of separate commissioners, we could give that body a bit more clout and allow it to look at individual cases. There could be, as with, I think, the United Nations, a system of rapporteurs—that is, people who report; they could concentrate on children for a few years and then on, say, older people for another few years. It would mean that you would have one organisation covering all those topics. Do you have any thoughts on that?