The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
I think that he did, yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
Mr Campbell, it has been argued that, if we set a very tight timescale and cost, that would undermine the independence of the chair. Do you agree?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
I thank you both for your answers so far. I particularly enjoyed some of them—I liked the one about having a target of 250 pages for the report. That is the first time that any of our witnesses have said that they set a target for the report. That is one of my questions. How definitely can we set targets at the beginning? I asked one of our previous witnesses what would happen if we told him that he had two years and £5 million and that he should just do the best job that he could with that. His answer was, “I wouldn’t do it.” He did not like the target being that tight. Am I being unfair to suggest that that could happen, Mr Sturrock?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
However, the downside is that somebody reading the report, such as a victim, would not be able to pin down that they could blame a particular person.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
So, people accepted that.
Liz Smith asked you about how things have changed over the years. In your submission, you said:
“The present culture could lead to less openness and more defensiveness”.
If that is the culture that we are in nowadays, that concerns me a bit. If there is a statutory public inquiry, do you think that people will be less open and more defensive, whereas in your type of inquiry, in the hospitals, people were more open and less defensive?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
Well, we will create some more jobs for accountants, perhaps. That is a fair answer.
Earlier, you used the phrase that an inquiry can grow arms and legs. I take the point that something new can come up that nobody knew about, and that is outwith our control—but if an inquiry does grow arms and legs, is that the chair’s responsibility? Is it the ministers’ responsibility? Is it because the terms of reference were not tight enough?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
How does the chair make that decision? You say that it could be that the chair would like to look into it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
Yes. While you are speaking, I would like to go back to the NHS Highland inquiry, which others have asked you about. I thought that some of the phrases that you used in your written submission were very interesting. You said that it was a “safe space”, that things were “discussed confidentially”, that it was not “forensic” and that there was no “legal advice or representation”. You were asked about people’s satisfaction with that and you sounded positive. Did you receive any comeback on those points, such as that people would have wanted it in public or would have wanted a lawyer?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
Did that make them less open and less candid?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
John Mason
Do you think that that would not have happened if it had been in public?