The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
John Mason
That is fair.
One of the things that the 2005 act says—in section 17, I think—is that the judge or whoever is leading the inquiry must avoid “unnecessary cost”.
I will start with Ms Morgan this time. You have been involved in a few inquiries. Do you have a view on that issue? Do you think that public inquiries are avoiding unnecessary costs, or do you think that unnecessary costs are being incurred?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
John Mason
Am I right in thinking that some of that would require new legislation, because the Inquiries Act 2005 is what lies behind most of this?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
John Mason
Do you know whether the Scottish Parliament has the power to change the 2005 act?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
John Mason
Yes, because it seems that, sometimes, public pressure builds up and the minister eventually gives way and accepts the need for a public inquiry.
You have already been asked about the issue of terms of reference, so I will not go back over that, but I was interested to read this week that the families of the Chinook helicopter disaster would like there to be a public inquiry so that they can get hold of files. However, they simply want to get hold of those files, so I do not know that a public inquiry is needed. Is that a bit of an outlier? Is it the case that people call for a public inquiry when they want something else?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
John Mason
Some of the suggestions that you and other witnesses have made, such as sharing lawyers and setting up the rooms more rapidly, might save a little bit here and there, but I do not see how that would make a radical change to the cost of, and the time involved in, an inquiry. I have suggested to other witnesses that we might be able to look at it the other way round. We could tell people that they have three years and ÂŁ5 million to do an inquiry and that they should just do the very best that they can within that framework. Would that be a major disadvantage, as compared with the open-ended approach that we seem to have? I put that to Ms McKee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
Yes—we would expect internal and external audit to be involved in that process for the universities, so I will be very interested to see what the report comes out with.
On financial sustainability, we are thinking mainly about universities and colleges, but what about other training providers, such as those in the private sector? Is there any need to oversee them and look at their financial sustainability, or can we simply rely on the private sector to look after that aspect?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
So, broadly, you would have more confidence in a bigger organisation than in a smaller one.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
Okay—I am happy to leave it at that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
I welcome the draft order. I think that it is great that we will get rid of the Glasgow Colleges Regional Board, and I am delighted that the three colleges will be separate. Can the minister say anything about collaboration between the three colleges going forward? Although I want the colleges to be independent, they will need to work together to some extent.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
The convener has already raised a number of issues in the financial area, and that is where I want to go. The Parliament’s website says that a financial memorandum
“should set out best estimates of the costs, savings, and changes to revenues arising from a Bill.”
However, as I understand it from Mr Mott, we do not have an estimate of the pension costs. Does that mean that you are failing to give what is normally expected from a financial memorandum?