The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
That is helpful. Perhaps related to that, paragraph 18 on page 7 of your forecasts document says that, when the UK gives pay rises, the level of funding that the Scottish Government receives depends on how those pay rises are funded. It says:
“Specifically, it depends on whether pay increases over and above the current UK budget plans are funded from new, additional money, or from existing departmental resources.”
Again, that frustrates me, because it is all so short term, but we are all trying to look at a longer-term plan. We are back to this living hand-to-mouth situation whereby we just do not know what is happening. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
That also applies to welfare. If increased welfare spending is announced tomorrow, we will not know that until the UK Government tells us. Would we expect to know that tomorrow, or would it be some time before we would know where that money was coming from?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
My final point is on the 2027-28 negative reconciliation figure, which is £851 million. That sounds absolutely scary, because we have a limit of only £600 million or £700 million. That number will go up and down, though, and every other set of figures that we have mentioned, including those on social security, will impact on that, will it not? Is it correct to say that it is incredibly difficult to predict the reconciliation figure?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Thanks very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
That is a good phrase.
Police officers are used to working to timescales, as I presume you are. As you have said, they have so many cases to look at, and they have to do it within a fixed timescale. How does that work? When you are asked to investigate something or produce evidence for a public inquiry, there is a fixed timescale. Is it right that your staff have to work to that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
What would happen then? Would the police go to the chair of the inquiry and ask to be given a bit longer?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
So, the aim would be to clarify both the time and the money involved.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
When a public inquiry starts, do you think that the public—or a limited group, such as victims or their families—have unrealistic expectations?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
John Mason
The convener asked you about the numbers of staff. Again, comparing the three universities—and I accept that the scale is different for each of them—I note that the number of staff in the other two universities that are represented here today stayed roughly steady between 2023 and 2024, but your number went up by 958. Given that you seemed to be coming into a difficult period, that seems quite a big increase, when you have roughly 12,000 staff. Will those same staff be leaving? Why were so many staff brought on, when now you are having to get rid of some?