The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3369 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
John Mason
Other members might have follow-on questions on that point.
France, which has been mentioned a few times as a comparator, seems to have a much wider scheme in the sense that people need to have a certificate for many more services. Does that make a difference? Can we be more relaxed because we are saying that our scheme is for only a very small number of high-risk, luxury items? Is the advantage of France’s wider scheme that it has become more widely accepted? I will put that question to Professor Dye, because he is in France.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
John Mason
Thank you; that was helpful. If we did not have vaccination certificates, what would we need to do? For example, if we were not to have certificates, would we just close all nightclubs at midnight? If the attendance limit for events was 10,000, would we put a limit of 10,000 on all crowds?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
John Mason
I will leave it at that, just now.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
John Mason
Professor Reicher mentioned conscientious objection. I am interested in how that might work. Can somebody simply say that they object to vaccination passports and therefore will not get one? If so, should they still be excluded from going to a big football match or a nightclub or that kind of thing, or should they be counted as exempt, just like somebody who is medically exempt?
09:15COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
John Mason
That leads me to my final question, which I will put to Professor Drury. Although the intention of the Government and the Parliament is that certification would be needed only for nightclubs, big crowds and so on, I presume that employers and other venues could use the system as part of their entry requirements. Would that be a good thing or a bad thing? Are there risks in that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
John Mason
One of the experts in today’s previous panel said that, at one point, we thought that a 70 per cent vaccination rate would be enough to give herd immunity to our whole society. We have now realised that that figure was too low. Are there are target figures, both for the whole population and for the minorities who, as Mr Fairlie said, have not got the vaccine yet?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
John Mason
Most members have asked about the tracking of Covid expenditure. I will continue with that theme.
Is tracking Covid expenditure possible? Is it helpful or necessary? For example, if someone’s operation—a hip replacement, say—has been postponed because of Covid and they now need more painkillers while they wait and they have to see a nurse or a general practitioner, how do we track the cost of the painkillers and the appointment with the nurse or GP? The nurse and the GP are there anyway, and the appointment is not directly related to Covid, but we could say that those costs came about because of Covid. There is never going to be a right answer to how that spending is tracked. I can see arguments on both sides, so surely a judgment has to be made. Will you comment on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
John Mason
We have spent time before on the links with national outcomes, and we will spend time on that in future, but I will leave that for the moment.
One of your other suggestions, which is in paragraph 26 of the report, is:
“future updates should include better information about planned spending options and how these could affect outcomes.”
What do you mean by that? Local government often has options in its budgeting. A council will say something like, “If we close all the libraries, that will save us £1 million.” The public then get excited and react, the libraries are saved, and that is good news. That is not the way that we have tended to do Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government budgeting. Do you mean that we should throw out options for people to comment on or do you mean something else?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
John Mason
I want to follow up on what Mr Taylor said to Liz Smith about looking at changes during the year. I get the point that was made by Ross Greer—or whoever made it—that we should maybe have four reviews or that they should happen at fixed times. Will Mr Taylor unpack that a bit more? If we got a bit of extra money from Westminster through Barnett consequentials and the Government announced that it would be put into childcare or something like that, do you think that the Education, Children and Young People Committee or the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, for example, should then do a bit more work on that announcement? Would you suggest that committees might examine such matters more than they have done in the past?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
John Mason
Does that matter, though? Should we be worried about that, or do we just have to accept it?