The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
John Mason
I am just following on from what colleagues have already asked about, but I note that Professor Gillies makes the point that
“UEG, Court and their committees and groups should have been aware of the worsening financial situation as early as December 2023”.
You have indicated that there were certainly problems at that point. However, in answer to Mr FitzPatrick, you said that there needed to be savings in 2024-25. If the problems became obvious as early as December 2023, why were cuts not made to expenditure in 2023-24?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
John Mason
You have also accepted that the cash position drifted a bit and that the cash balance went down quite dramatically. We saw a lot of new buildings when we visited last summer. Was it too ambitious to go ahead with some of that capital expenditure? Would it have been better not to spend on building some of those buildings?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
Mr Fotheringham, I understand that you and I are both members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, so I will focus on the finances.
Can you explain the system with the management accounts? It appears that some of the accounts did not get to the court in a timely fashion. I assume that the accounts were prepared by relatively junior staff. Did they come to you after that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
That is another of the large four firms.
We have already had a little bit of talk about the slightly hostile environment and the fact that the principal was quite a strong personality, let us say. I wonder whether that is something that the internal auditors might have flagged up. Would you expect them to do that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
Does that suggest that he did not get involved in a lot of the detail?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
As the finance director, was it not your job to allocate it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
Why was there even a betterment fund? Why did the money not go straight into departments?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
I will leave it at that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
At what stage did the principal, Professor Gillespie, get the management accounts?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
John Mason
Okay; fair enough.
I am interested in when the problems should have been picked up. According to Professor Gillies’s answer to question 12 of the report,
“UEG, Court and their committees and groups should have been aware of the worsening financial situation as early as December 2023”.
Do you agree that that should have been the case or do you think that she has misunderstood?