The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2021
John Mason
I am a passionate fan but, sadly, my club does not get 10,000 fans.
On spot checking, I think that you said that you do not want a fixed percentage. Can you suggest what percentage of fans would be spot-checked if that approach was taken?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2021
John Mason
That was helpful. Professor Leitch, do you wish to add anything?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2021
John Mason
On a different issue, I understand that the regulations are going to be introduced quite late on and will be subject to the made affirmative procedure. Would it be possible to bring them forward a little bit so that we can approve them before the end of September?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2021
John Mason
I still wonder whether you are slightly overstating the case. Lots of the restaurants that I go to throw out all the younger kids at a certain time—9 or 10 o’clock—so such things can be done.
One of Mr Doncaster’s arguments was that people at football matches are mainly outdoors, so certification should not be needed. Do you accept that we are now going to have such a system? I presume that most people have to use public transport to get to football stadiums, and there is a fair bit of space inside stadiums where people eat, go to the toilet and so on.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2021
John Mason
People in parts of the population who are not vaccinated are at greater risk, so I presume that, from a health point of view, there is a good purpose behind the scheme. However, you are saying that despite the good purpose of encouraging people to get vaccinated, it could fall foul of some of the 2010 act.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2021
John Mason
I also ask Professor Leitch about other countries’ experiences.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
I would like to return to a point that Ray Perman made, which was also in his submission. I think that you used the term “Barnett guarantee”. Some people have said that the Barnett formula has worked through the pandemic, and that that is what has given us the money that we have used. Are you suggesting that that was bypassed? Can you tell me what you mean by “Barnett guarantee”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
If a family is short of food or cannot afford to heat their house, the cash is pretty helpful, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
The point has been made that we need more taxpayers—therefore, more people. We are not having enough kids, so is the only answer to have more immigration?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
I do not know whether Ms Murray wants to say anything on that. I also have a question specifically for her. We talked earlier about how complicated the fiscal framework is. Is it inevitable that it would be more unfair if we made it simpler? Are we balancing fairness against complexity, or is that not a fair thing to say?