The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3349 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
It is good for us to hear a range of evidence. I accept that.
One of your suggestions is that the victims or people who are affected should be satisfied by the inquiry or should get closure, or however you want to describe it. You have been involved in four public inquiries. Have you found that all the victims have been satisfied by the procedures?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Were all those in relation to the ICL Stockline inquiry satisfied?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
—although not in the same way as if we had been in the hospital. The trams cost about £500 million, so we all paid about £100 each for them, so we are victims. However, as a victim of the tram project, I do not feel particularly helped by the inquiry taking so long.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I take your point that a major decision is made when a minister agrees to a public inquiry. It just seems that, once such a decision has been made, it is a bit of an open field. I know that you do not like the term “blank cheque”. However, I asked one of the previous witnesses, Lord Hardie, what he would do if we gave him £5 million for two years and asked him to give us the best result he could in that time. He said that he would not do it. Others have said that they would. Would you agree with him?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
For the trams, it might have been.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I do live in a flat, as it happens, most of the year.
Mr Drummond, the RIAS submission says that using a per square metre charge will involve quite a lot of “cost and complexity”. Would it be better to use a calculation that is based on value rather than square metres?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
You were asked about Lord Penrose’s statement, in which he said that every penny spent on the contaminated blood inquiry was a penny less for the NHS or front-line services. That might have been a bit insensitive, but would you agree that it was a true statement?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Would the chair ask them unfair questions? Surely the chair should adapt the questions to what the participant can deal with.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
If we are raising a special tax, both here and in the rest of the UK, for cladding for residential buildings, there is an argument that a special case should be made to deal with cladding and RAAC outwith colleges’ normal capital expenditure. I am not expecting a commitment today but, when the minister and cabinet secretary are making arguments at the budget table, I hope that they can make the point that we have done something special for the residential sector and that we should consider doing something special for colleges and others.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Related to that point, I am interested in a paragraph in the report about colleges that was published on Friday, which stated:
“Colleges are also actively reviewing their estates to identify disposals that could generate cash ... To this end, a number of colleges are actively reviewing whether one or more of their campuses require to be closed.”
Is that something that the Government would actively support, or is it something that we have to reluctantly accept? Are we expecting a wholesale reduction in the number of campuses across the board? I think that one is closing in Clackmannanshire.