łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 13 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2963 contributions

|

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Excess Deaths Inquiry

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

John Mason

In response to Murdo Fraser’s question, dentistry and a few other things were mentioned. Clearly, recovery is different across the board. I have not seen my dentist for more than two years. I have chipped my teeth during that time but, fortunately, that has not caused me a lot of pain. Where are we going with dentistry? How soon can we get back to six-monthly appointments? Is that entirely up to individual practices? I dislike the idea of going to a private dentist, but is that the advice in order to take pressure off the NHS?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Environmental Fiscal Measures

Meeting date: 15 March 2022

John Mason

Thank you for your really interesting input so far, Mr Blackburn. One of your conclusions seems to be that we could do with an overarching, simplified carbon tax. I hope that that is the correct phrase. Will you explain that to me? You said that it would have to be introduced at the UK level, but I suppose that we have an interest in that, too, and we can encourage the UK Government to do certain things. Would it be like putting VAT on everything, with a 5 per cent rate on some things, 10 per cent on others and 20 per cent on the rest? Is that the idea behind a carbon tax?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Environmental Fiscal Measures

Meeting date: 15 March 2022

John Mason

Your comment about changing people’s behaviour leads me on to my next question. Page 23 of your report highlights the single-use carrier bag charge and the Scottish landfill tax, and you suggest that, because an individual is paying 5p or 10p for a bag, that directly changes their behaviour. However, the Scottish landfill tax does not quite work that way. I do not pay for the damage that I do; the council has to pay a bit more in some vague way; and it might change my council tax, but it will not really have an impact on me at all.

11:00  

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Environmental Fiscal Measures

Meeting date: 15 March 2022

John Mason

You are right. There is a lack of information. I do not know where to put my old electric razor, or whatever it may be. Frankly, some of the recycling sites in Glasgow have deteriorated. There used to be somewhere for electrical items; now, I cannot find it.

You also seem to be quite keen on hypothecation—that the money goes towards something. I get it for the tourist tax, as Douglas Lumsden was asking about. However, in a sense, it does not matter where the money from the single-use carrier bag goes. The point is that I do not want to spend 5p. Some businesses—most, I think—give the money to charity, but I do not know to which charities. Is that important? If we could make money from carrier bags or from returning cups or whatever, and put into the national health service, would that not be equally good?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Environmental Fiscal Measures

Meeting date: 15 March 2022

John Mason

That is fine. There is so much in this that we could all be asking questions for an hour, which, presumably, the convener does not want.

There is another biggie that we have not really looked at too much this morning. You have talked about tax being neutral, and your idea is that we could take a bit off income tax or council tax, and put it on to something else, such as waste. A big issue that you mention in your report is fuel duty, and the fact that, when we fill up our cars, so much of the cost goes to the Government. Where do you think we can go with that? If we are giving all those incentives for electric cars, which do not pay so much road tax—they do not pay this and they do not pay that; I think that you even suggest that they should get cheaper parking—how do we compensate for that? What will happen?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Environmental Fiscal Measures

Meeting date: 15 March 2022

John Mason

I could ask more questions, but I will leave it at that.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Environmental Fiscal Measures

Meeting date: 15 March 2022

John Mason

I note that, on page 37 of your report, you say that

“lower-income households”

will spend

“a higher percentage of their income on high-emission activities”.

That is a challenge.

Are you suggesting that we should just rename landfill tax, the charge on single-use bags and so on a carbon tax? Is that the idea?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

John Mason

That is very helpful. Dr Smyth, do you have anything to add?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Excess Deaths Inquiry

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

John Mason

Dr Fenton, I was interested in a couple of points in your paper and I would like you to expand on them. You say:

“Cancer is one of the few conditions where staging is routinely carried out and recorded. It is therefore presented as a proxy”

that might help our understanding. I do not understand why we are using cancer as a proxy.

You also mention the number of years lost, or YLL. I am not familiar with that phrase, although I assume that it is commonly used in some circles. Should we focus more on that kind of thing rather than on the number of deaths or some of the more simplistic measures?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

John Mason

I have one question. You have touched on there being issues other than the one about the witnessing of signatures. There might be reforms to mental health legislation at some stage, so would it be better to leave this one small change until we look at wider issues for mental health legislation? I am concerned that only 25 per cent of people have a named person. Do you agree that there are bigger issues than just the one about witnesses?