The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
John Mason
One of my main concerns is ensuring that delegates from poorer countries are not going to be disadvantaged, as they are less likely to have had the vaccine, and I seek your reassurance that every effort will be made to treat every delegate fairly and that those from richer countries do not have an advantage in that respect.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
John Mason
On a more general point, I think that there are three main vaccines that are being used in this country. Are we clear whether, as has been claimed by some people, they have no impact, some impact or different impacts on transmission of the virus? On a more international level, do some of the vaccines that people coming from overseas might have had affect whether they transmit the virus when they come here?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
John Mason
The convener’s line of questioning has got me thinking a bit. We have talked about people from here going overseas, but what about people who are coming here for the 26th United Nations climate change conference of the parties, or COP26? I assume that some of them will be in the complicated categories that Jason Leitch highlighted; they might have had a vaccination but have no certificate, for example, or they might be coming from, say, Russia and have had the Sputnik V vaccine, which I believe we have not approved. How will that work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
I accept that.
Ms Walker, I did not ask you to respond to any of those questions, but you are more than welcome to. However, my first question for you follows on from what Liz Smith was asking about; indeed, you might already have answered it. You say in your submission that
“Prior to the ... pandemic, the Scottish Government had been considering methods of improving the tax policy-making process and the legislative processes for taxesâ€
and that you would like to see that worked through. Are you talking purely about a finance bill, or is there a bit more to it than that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
I have another question that is aimed at you, although Mr Robertson might want to come in, too. The voluntary sector has asked for multiyear funding, as it does every year, and a bit more predictability, which Mr Robertson mentioned. In practice—you are looking at the practical side of this—is it possible for any Government, whether a Westminster Government, the Scottish Government or even local government to make such a commitment and to adopt a multiyear approach, rather than the annual process that we have at the moment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Thank you. Again, I have a question that is primarily for Polly Tolley, unless either of the other two witnesses want to come in. Another of COSLA’s suggestions was that ring fencing should be removed and that we should give local authorities more flexibility in how they spend money. I know that that is an issue for citizens advice bureaux, because some of them get funding from local authorities and some do not. From a citizens advice point of view as well as from a wider point of view, do you have a view on whether we should make more decisions centrally in Parliament or leave more decisions to local government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
On empty property rates, which the convener asked about, my recollection is that properties were sitting empty for quite a long time while their owners appeared to hope or expect that the property value would go up and they would make money that way, so it did not matter whether they put someone into the property. The convener might remember the example of the post office building in George Square—a beautiful building, right in the centre of Glasgow, which sat empty for ages. Is that issue not why we brought in the empty property rates? Is there a risk that development would be slowed further if we did not have those provisions?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Your submission—and, I think, the submission from Scottish Chambers of Commerce—talks about matching UK tax rates, cutting property taxes, LBTT incentives and so on. There might be arguments for all those moves, but if the Scottish Government and the Parliament take in less money from those taxes, we might have to, say, cut funding to the NHS or local government. At a time when everyone is struggling and the NHS is clearly under pressure, can you justify cutting any taxes, given such knock-on effects?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
That is helpful.
Your submission says that the
“Scottish Government should undertake and publish a full assessment of Scottish tax powers and their potential to prevent and reduce child poverty.â€
Will you expand on what you mean?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Will John Dickie clarify his understanding of the cost of doubling the child payment? The convener mentioned £163 million, but I heard that doubling the payment to £20 and covering everybody under 16 would amount to £220 million. Do you have a specific figure?