The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
John Mason
Thank you for that. I do not want to spend too much longer on the subject, but I highlight that one of my nephews, who is aged 22, did not go to university but has done extremely well and has bought his own house.
The main point that I want to discuss concerns the GDP growth rates. We have an interesting paper from the Scottish Parliament information centre that contains predicted growth rates. Those predictions have been made over a relatively short time, but I accept that timing might be part of the issue.
10:45According to the paper, the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s prediction is for a 3.8 per cent growth in GDP in 2022; the Fraser of Allander Institute’s is for 4.8 per cent; the Office for Budget Responsibility’s is for 6 per cent; the National Institute of Economic and Social Research’s is for 4.7 per cent; the Bank of England’s is for 5 per cent; and HM Treasury’s is for 5 per cent.
The OBR’s prediction seems to be a bit of an outlier, as it is quite high. It was made in October, which was only two months ago, and your prediction is more recent. Can you say a bit more about those differences? Obviously, the issue has a real effect on our budget, and the OBR’s prediction seems very high.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
John Mason
I am interested in what Graeme Roy said about differentiating between what we can and cannot change, and in some of the comments about productivity, which is probably more the work of the Economy and Fair Work Committee—I think that Michelle Thomson also sits on that committee.
I still wonder about productivity. Putting two crew members on a train is less productive than putting one on it, but doing so increases safety, enables the collection of fares and so on, so productivity is not always an issue. Is tourism a sector in which it is harder to have good productivity, because a good hotel has more staff and looks after people better? I am not sure.
Where I am going with this is that we cannot control the population, in one sense, but we could control it with immigration. Out of all that we are talking about—productivity, skills and population—is population the biggest issue? Is that what is holding us back?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
John Mason
We have not said very much in this session about capital expenditure. We seem to be coming to the limit of how much we can borrow for capital expenditure, which is ÂŁ3 billion. If we have to cut back on capital expenditure, will that result in a hit on growth in the economy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
John Mason
I will move to a slightly different point. In paragraph 39 on page 14 of your report, you say that we are heading towards a £469 million reconciliation for 2024-25. You make the point—it seems to be common sense—that any Government that knew that it was doing that would slightly underspend each year. However, you highlight that there is a problem, in that we cannot save up that money in preparation, because of the rules around the Scotland reserve. Could somebody expand on that and explain it to me and others?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
John Mason
It all gets quite complex, and I presume that that will be one of the issues that will be discussed in the review of the fiscal framework.
My final question is linked to that. In paragraph 2.35 on page 29 of the report, you talk about “average underspend” with regard to the Scotland reserve, and you say that
“the utility of the Reserve”
has been reduced from 2.1 per cent to 1.5 per cent of the budget. Can you explain why that is happening, Professor Breedon?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
John Mason
I realise that you work at a university and that you said earlier that there was an assumption that, if people went to university, they would get a good job and that would be them for life—that was absolutely the case when I was younger.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
John Mason
I take your point that there is probably a long-term and a short-term issue to deal with and that we probably need to do more in the long term. Do you think, though, that it would be worth repeating that short-term project, even though it would involve funding of only ÂŁ1,000?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
John Mason
Yes. I asked Mr Holliday the same question. I think that, in general, health services have struggled to interact with men, especially younger men, in poorer areas. It is not just about the vaccine, is it? Is there a particular problem with the vaccine?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
John Mason
Sorry—that question was aimed at Professor Quinn.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
John Mason
My question is for Derek Holliday. We have long had a problem of men in general, especially younger men, not engaging with a range of health services—it is not just about the vaccine. Is there a particular problem to do with the vaccine? I represent the east end of Glasgow. Are men in poorer areas not getting involved? Are we talking about a longer-term problem, rather than just a problem with vaccines?