The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Does the cabinet secretary have any idea what Stephen Kerr’s proposals would cost in financial terms?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Thanks.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Has that been the problem for the SFC in the past? Has it just not had the resources to do the work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I will follow on from Willie Rennie’s line of questioning. In its submission, Skills Development Scotland specifically said:
“the SFC is empowered to fund apprenticeships, however it is not legally required to do so”.
There is a concern that it could go either way: the SFC might focus too much on colleges and universities and not enough on apprenticeships, or vice versa. Does there need to be something in the bill—such as ring-fenced money—to direct the SFC a bit more in that regard, or can we leave it to the SFC to get it right in the doing, as you said?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Thanks. Ms Reid, do you have anything to say on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Does the SFC have sufficient powers, or is it more a question of how it uses the powers? The Educational Institute of Scotland feels that the SFC has not used its powers as much as it could have done. Is that more about attitude and culture?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
The problem is that if they are autonomous and make the wrong decisions, they come back to us and want to be bailed out.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Mr Yeates, if it is all more joined up, surely we are going to boost the Highlands and Islands more.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Is it the case that those staff are in a poorer scheme and would be moving to a better one, which means that there would be more costs in future? Is there also a backdating element?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
A lot of staff will be moving from SDS to the SFC, but that might not change the culture of the whole organisation, or is it inevitable that that will happen?