The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Okay. Ms Topley, I realise that I have not asked you any questions. Do you want to comment on that? Would that give us a more joined-up approach?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I will leave that for my colleagues on the finance committee to dig into.
My next question is for all of you. One argument in favour of the bill is that it would simplify things by putting everything under one umbrella, which might help us to align the tertiary education system with the national economic and social goals. The need for investment in the highlands has been mentioned. This is a general question, but would simplifying things mean that we could take a much more joined-up approach that could be tied in with the national economic and social goals, the national performance framework and all those things? Would that be easier?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
If someone had worked for 10 years in SDS, would that be treated as if they had worked for the Funding Council for 10 years?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Mr Yeates, you have mentioned the figure of £30 million umpteen times already. Am I right in thinking that a lot of that is to do with pensions? I know that the Finance and Public Administration Committee, of which Mr Greer and I are also members, will be looking at that in more detail, but the issue has been mentioned so I would like to touch on it a little. Will you clarify where that big figure comes from?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I asked the member about the frequency of inspections. I stand to be corrected, but my understanding is that there are about 250 inspections a year now and that his proposal would take that number up to 800, which is three times as many inspections as there are at present. There would be quite a cost to that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Stephen Kerr mentions the reality that the inspector might find. Can that be objectively measured, and how would the inspector do that? They might say to the trade union representative that morale is terrible, but I presume that they would have to do something more than that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Would the type of employment contract not be fairly standard throughout a number of establishments? Would there not be a lot of repetition in that regard?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
One of my colleagues will ask you more about the committees later on. I was asking more about the general relationship.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
It says “we believe”, which suggests that it is your view.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I am not arguing with that. I just feel that your evidence today and your paper are designed to undermine the bill and to paint it as being as awful as it possibly can be. For example, your submission says:
“we believe that the timelines for current reform means that any benefits or unintended consequences of this programme will not be understood for a decade.”
Surely that is overstating the case.