The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
You do not have to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
There is quite a lot in there that I could pursue with you. The extra money that the SFC is getting for this apparently new legal duty is not very much. I think that, in a full year, it is between £16,000 and £110,000. That raises the question—and I suspect that the colleges would raise this as well—of what it actually does with the information. You said that the system may or may not be working in practice. In practice, is it very dependent on universities and colleges giving it the information? Is it proactive at all? Does the funding council come into the universities at all?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
That is helpful. Thanks.
I just quoted the bit a about the funding council having to “secure the monitoring”, whatever that means. There is also a bit about its being able to make recommendations and give guidance. Do you think that there needs to be something more solid in the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
첹—t.
Professor Seaton, you said that simplifying the landscape is a good thing, and I am certainly in favour of that. Are there risks to doing that? The SFC’s staff numbers will grow dramatically. Will it be hard for it to get right the balance between the university-college side and the apprenticeship side?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
From some of the evidence that we have had, we get the impression that the relationship between Skills Development Scotland and business and industry has been quite good, but there is some nervousness in some circles that that will be disrupted. For example, the UK Fashion and Textile Association said:
“Historically, the SFC has been more focused around research and academia but if also taking over from SDS they need to hit the ground running in terms of being employer facing.”
Is there a concern that the SFC will struggle to have as good a relationship with industry as SDS has had?
Either of the witnesses can answer that.
09:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
On the risk-based approach, it is common for auditors in business and in all sorts of areas of life to focus more on risky subjects than on less risky ones. For starters, would the member not accept that that is quite a good principle? Secondly, can he tell us how many inspections there are at the moment, how many there would be under his plan and whether there is any costing of that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Okay.
As I understand it, a lot of what you have been doing falls under your normal guidance practice, some of which will be put into legislation in future. Will that make any difference, or is it just a case of formalising what is already happening?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Ms Reid, are you as relaxed about that as Mr Seaton?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I want to pursue the subject of universities a little more. You talked about having discussions with universities, and you also talked about scrutiny. The words “discussions” and “scrutiny” strike me as being slightly different. Discussions involve sitting around the table and having a chat about things, whereas scrutiny is a much more proactive process that involves going into places and looking at things. Will you say a bit more about your present relationship with universities and colleges and whether you think that that might change in future?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Would the counter argument not be that, if it is all under one umbrella, and we have, for example, young people doing university courses that do not lead anywhere, the SFC would have the ability to switch some of the money into apprenticeships? In that way, it could be a better thing for apprentices.