The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2904 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
John Mason
If I wanted to find the annual figures, could I multiply the period 1 figures by 12, roughly?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
John Mason
Ms Cook, on the idea of having a debate about tax, would small businesses prefer to pay more tax and rates and get better road surfaces, street lighting and hospitals and more police, or would they prefer to drop domestic rates and other tax and have poorer services? Is that a debate that we can have?
12:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
John Mason
One of the quotes that the convener used earlier was from your letter from July, which talked about “consistency of outcomes”. I presume that that is one of the main aims. Sometimes, there is a bit of tension between consistency of outcomes nationally and doing things locally, which you have just referred to, and I wonder how that will impact on costs. For example, in the Highlands, distances are greater, so if somebody is going to visit a person at home, that will take longer. It is also further to get to hospital, which is a different issue. However, by contrast, in Glasgow, there is sometimes a feeling that people have to be in greater need to get an intervention than is the case in other authorities, just because the overall need is so huge.
At the moment, COSLA and the councils get their funding through a formula. Will the national care service override that formula? Will finances be targeted at areas of greater need? How will that work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
John Mason
Would that involve going down the private finance initiative route? We pay a lot more in the long run in that way—if the capital does not come from tax.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
John Mason
We have concentrated on how we can raise more tax for existing expenditure, and I am sympathetic to that but, to be a little bit of a devil’s advocate, are there areas of expenditure where we could make cuts? For example, compared to the UK, is the Scottish social security system too generous? The previous panel told us that making up the difference is having an effect on other services. Linked to that, has the Scottish Government got too many priorities? Should we be trying to simplify things and just have fewer of them? What about the idea that we are being too generous in, say, giving the bus pass to everyone? Should we means-test and target some of that expenditure?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
John Mason
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
John Mason
I note that your paper states that the index per capita method is better than the comparable model, but are we not still left competing with England—specifically, with London and the south-east of England, which dominates the English economy—and, therefore, are we not permanently at a disadvantage?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
John Mason
We have heard from various places that we need a better public understanding of how budgets work. We have discussed whether, in the longer term, we should have more taxes and more spend or fewer taxes and less spend. We get the impression that in other countries—correct me if I am wrong, but I am thinking about the Nordic countries—there is a public debate on that and public agreement that they want higher taxes and better public services. Do you think that it is possible to have that debate in Scotland or the UK, Professor Bell?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
John Mason
Okay. That is very pessimistic.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
John Mason
Is the idea of longer-term and multiyear budgeting possible under the present fiscal framework when we do not know what we are going to get year by year?