The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2855 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
John Mason
Would you agree with the STUC, whose argument is that we should raise taxes to pay for that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
John Mason
Would having the proposed council not push that process forward?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
John Mason
John McKenzie, you have also said that, especially when it comes to firefighters, more people might be entitled to benefits. Do you have any thoughts about what that might cost?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
John Mason
In that case, may I move to Mr Corbett? I think that you are arguing that more women and more teachers would be due benefits. Assuming that the total benefit figure of 拢78 million stays the same, could it be allocated better?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
John Mason
Yes鈥攚e are also just about outwith time, I am afraid. Thank you very much for that.
10:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
John Mason
I will start with a few points that have already been raised. You said that we need to have a more fundamental review at some point. If, theoretically, there was a general election and a change of Government in January, could we start the fundamental review in February?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
John Mason
That is helpful, and I am sure that we will return to it in the future.
When it comes to how things have been done, the last time that the fiscal framework was set up, everything鈥攁s far as I could see鈥攚as on the table. John Swinney, I think, came back and told us what was happening and we debated it. However, this time, a limited amount was on the table. Obviously, something has changed.
To go back to VAT, you said that both Governments would have to agree either for the idea to be dropped or for it to go ahead. Is that the case? Could Westminster impose it on us?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
John Mason
On the bigger picture, I take your point鈥攎any of the experts from whom we heard at last week鈥檚 meeting were also quite positive about the agreement and about the use of the IPC method for the fiscal framework. However, I still have some concerns. First, we always seem to be competing with London. Our economy has to keep up with the rest of the UK. On the whole, we keep up with most parts of the UK, but every part of Europe struggles to match London. Is there not a fundamental bias against us?
Secondly, figures were mentioned at last week鈥檚 meeting in relation to Barnett that showed how our finances are being squeezed as a result of that. It was suggested that whereas, in the past, we got 129 per cent of rest-of-UK spending, we now get about 125 per cent of that spending, and that figure will probably fall to 120 per cent; it might even fall to 115 per cent.
If we put all that together, are we being squeezed in the longer term? Is that what we have got ourselves tied into?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
John Mason
I accept that, although the 13 per cent risk at the higher end of your estimate could still happen once in every seven or eight years.
Finally, the idea of there being a Scotland-specific shock and making provision for that has now been dropped. Can you say anything about that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
John Mason
I am reassured that that is on the table and that we will be looking at it in the longer term.
I have a couple of specific questions. We have been told by some that the 拢600 million resource borrowing might not be enough, because the forecast was that the adjustment might have been greater than that鈥攖hankfully, that was not what happened.