The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2810 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
John Mason
I will just finish off by saying that some of the products are very attractive. I buy scarves regularly for raffle prizes and things like that, and people are generally very positive about them. The slate place mats are very good as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
John Mason
Michael Marra mentioned pay policy. I want to press you a little bit on the figures. The Scottish Fiscal Commission has assumed that there will be a 4.5 per cent increase, but the SPCB, which we heard from this morning, is looking at a 6.7 per cent increase. Can you give us an indication of the kind of pay increases that we are talking about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
John Mason
My next question is on the council tax freeze and its mechanics and logic. What is the aim of the council tax freeze? Is it to help those people in most poverty? There has been a bit of debate over whether the £144 million for that is enough. Whether or not it is enough, it depletes the public purse as a whole, does it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
John Mason
I will turn to some of the projects that are coming up. You have already mentioned the increased use of hybrid working, which means that there are more spaces where people can work. How successful has the hub been? We all pass it regularly, and it does not appear to be very busy, but perhaps it is well used.
The submission contains the line:
“Office space planning and moves - £200k”.
What is that for?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
John Mason
I will leave the subject of commissioners, as it has had a good airing, and we are looking forward to the inquiry on that.
I wish to follow up on some of the points that the convener has raised. I think that using the AWE index is a reasonable way forward, both for ˿ and for ˿’ staff. I have worked out that the average for the MSP increase over the past four years is 2.9 per cent, which I think is pretty easy to sell, or reasonable, as some of the public, at least, do not want us to have any increase.
I think that you said that you are going to do more work on the ASHE figures and their volatility—which is the word that has been used. Do you have any clarity as to why those figures are volatile or more volatile than other measures?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
There is a UK policy and a Scottish policy, but you are assuming that both of them will carry on much as they are.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
I certainly find it helpful to have had the issue laid out in that way.
This is my final question. We have looked at the split of the £1,092 billion. Would I be right in saying that the split will be changing a bit? At the moment, the Scottish child payment is about half the spend, but that will not be the case in future. Will you explain why that is the case?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
I am looking at the overall picture of the additional spend of £1.092 billion that we have to find. I think that I am right in saying that roughly half of that is the Scottish child payment, which is completely ours because they do not have that in the UK, and that another big chunk is the extra money for ADP. Is that correct? Are there other factors in there as well?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
So, they are kind of rolled into the Barnett formula.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
As you said in answer to previous questions, you are assuming that there will be no change in policy and that both the UK and Scotland will carry on with their current policies. I presume that our figures could be affected by either of those changing. If the UK Government changes its policy, we will have more—is that right?