The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
Merging SDS and the SFC was just a thought, following Bill Kidd’s question. You have made your point. That is fine.
One of the proposals in the bill is to give the Scottish Funding Council statutory powers to look at the financial sustainability of colleges and universities. I realise that none of you is in that space. However, do you have any comments about the proposal to give the SFC more power in that area? The SFC seems to have had that responsibility in the past but it did not pick up that Dundee university was getting into trouble.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
That point has been raised. What about the financial sustainability and the oversight of other training providers? Is it happening or is more needed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
Do you think there is a role for SDS or the SFC to oversee the system or to get more involved?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
Would you rather that I started with Mr Davenport?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
That is fine. The table on page 4 of the financial memorandum lists various figures and 2026-27 looks like being the most expensive year. The cost of the bill for that year is shown as being between £2.2 million and £4.3 million. First, I am interested in your thoughts on those figures. I know that we have already talked about the number of staff transferring, so that would be a factor.
Somewhat more scarily, the pension shortfall payment is shown as being between £1 million and £23 million. The financial memorandum does not even pretend that that is an estimate. It is meant to give an estimate but it gives only an “illustration”, as the authors call it. Can you give me your view on that? Then perhaps I will ask you about something else.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
I am sorry to keep interrupting you. You rightly say that pensions have already been touched on, but that is the figure that scares me the most because it is so big. My understanding of TUPE—and I have only a limited understanding—is that someone should not lose out when they transfer. They should be either the same or better off. I was a bit surprised by the suggestion that the pensions would be backdated as if the person had already been in the SFC for five or 10 years or whatever. Is that fixed or is that area uncertain?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
That is probably relatively smaller compared to the pension question.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
John Mason
I could probably go on, but I will leave it at that. Thanks, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
I think that, when they do a bit of pre-budget scrutiny and report back, some committees wonder whether it really has an impact on the Government. However, linked to that, there is the idea that committees should look at financial matters throughout the year, which, I presume, would have an impact. Can you say something about the impact that committees are having on the Government in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
I declare an interest in that I am a chartered accountant. I think that some of my colleagues charge by the hour.
I was going to draw a kind of comparison. A company’s accounts have to be audited, and I think that most people would say that, although auditors get it wrong at times, they are independent. However, the financial arrangements for companies are very different. There is a legal requirement for financial accounts to be submitted, usually within nine months or thereabouts, and audited. In the case of banks, the timeframe is even shorter than that. I come from that background and might be biased, but do you think that there is scope for an audit of a public inquiry? That would still be independent. You spoke about finding the balance between independence and controls. Could the legal side learn from the accountancy side?