The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
Going back to the triangle of time, cost and quality that you mentioned, Ms Dunlop, we all understand the tension between those three things. For example, an inquiry might have been going for five years and give a fair picture of what has been happening. If it goes for another five years, we might get better quality but it is not that much better. Is there a balance to how far we go with quality? I said in my questions to the previous panel that people in other professions do the best that they can in the time available, but it is never perfect—whereas Lord Hardie wants to do a proper job.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
When the chair says no to that, is it because of their sense of personal responsibility, or is anyone going to ask the chair about those unnecessary costs later?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
Okay. There are a few different lines that we could go down at this stage.
Covid has been mentioned. Everyone here lived through Covid. My feeling is that we know about 95 per cent of what happened—the decisions that were made and roughly why they were made—and what we do not know about is relatively limited. I would have thought that the inquiry would focus on that bit, but the inquiries just seem to cover everything. Does that bring us back to the terms of reference, Ms Dunlop?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
But with regard to public inquiries, there could be divergence, if the legal profession was gaining from longer public inquiries and the public might be losing out.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
I suspect not, but that is my opinion.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
You would not do it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
That is fair enough.
Lord Hardie, you used the word “proper” in your response. I wonder about other professions: for example, a general practitioner has to assess somebody in 10 minutes. I accept that that is far too short. I am an accountant—accountants have to audit a company in, say, nine months. People in most professions—and in other jobs as well, such as the cleaner of this room—have a time limit and are expected to produce not a perfect result, but the best that they can, within that time limit. Would that not be a better model?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
Okay. Dr Ireton, I will ask you the same question: is the inquiry process too legal?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
I suppose that that ties into the rule in the legislation about avoiding “unnecessary cost”. That is quite a subjective term, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
John Mason
Preventing a recurrence is impossible, is it not?