The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2775 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
Thank you for that.
I have a much more general question about young people going into careers. I go into schools and ask how many girls are thinking about engineering, and the number is still very few. There still seem to be gender stereotypes. Further, some schools still have a big emphasis on university—in some schools, apprenticeships do not seem to be pushed quite so much. Teachers cannot know about every single job that is out there, but we have picked up in the committee and elsewhere that sometimes the advice that young people get does not cover the broad range of options. I realise that this is a very general question, but do you have any thoughts about where we are going in the long term in trying to get young girls into careers such as engineering?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
At the moment, I am just looking for an assurance that things are moving forward, because the bill seemed to get a little bit stuck at one point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
I realise that it is a big subject, so thank you very much for that response.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
The Promise bill has also been raised. I accept that you cannot say exactly what will be in it, but I met Who Cares? Scotland last week and its big ask is that the bill should include the right to independent advocacy. Is the minister able to say anything on that score?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
That is fine—just as long as the issue is on the minister’s radar. The convener and I met a group of care-experienced young people from Wales the other week, and it appeared that they already have the right to independent advocacy. I am not sure whether that is exactly comparable with the Scottish situation, but that is what they told us. It will be interesting to see the bill.
I will move on to another sector. I realise that Liz Smith is here today and may want to raise points about her bill, but I want to raise this issue myself. The committee has been copied into a certain amount of correspondence between the minister and Liz Smith about her Schools (Residential Outdoor Education) (Scotland) Bill. The committee was very enthusiastic about the idea of residential outdoor education, but, for me, cost was the big issue. Could we forget about the bill and put some money into a pot that would top up the existing system? Is that an option? Ms Don-Innes’s letter of 10 June said that Liz Smith had to engage with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and the trade unions, which seems an impossible barrier to me.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
First, perhaps I could touch on one or two issues that have been raised already. On mainstreaming and ASN, Mr Logan answered the point about inconsistency across the country. I have seen a number of constituents whose children have additional support needs and who feel that, because they are in Glasgow, their children have to have much greater need in order to get into a special school, whereas they would get into a special needs school more easily if they lived in one of the surrounding authorities. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
John Mason
Thank you very much.
Another topic that has been mentioned is the inability of teachers to get a permanent job. My feeling is that, once teachers have had their training in cities such as Glasgow, they are reluctant to leave. That might be for good reasons if they have built up friends or have a family and all the rest of it. I think that I saw in the media this week that Papa Westray has struggled to get a teacher for its school for six years, so there seems to be a bit of an urban-rural split. Do you agree that that is the case? Once young teachers have trained, how do we encourage them not to stay in the city but to move into rural areas?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Mr McGowan, you previously mentioned the independence of public inquiries and said that it is a bit of philosophical question, which I kind of accept. You also suggested that, if the terms of reference were sharper and more focused at the beginning, that would—or might—solve the problem. What do you think of the idea that, alongside that, we say at the very beginning—I take the point that this should all be fixed at the beginning, not halfway through—“We want this inquiry to take two years and it’s going to cost £5 million, and these are the terms of reference”? Would that take away from the independence of inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Yes, and yet it is the case for other professions. A teacher will have 50 minutes, or whatever, with a set of pupils, and they will do the best that they can in that time. As an accountant, I would have to do an audit within three months—or whatever it might be—for a fixed fee. Auditors are still—I think—considered to be independent. It seems to be possible to do that kind of thing, but it seems that when we get the legal profession involved, they do not like that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
You might or might not want to answer this—[Interruption.] Sorry—my microphone is not on.