The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 853 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Graeme Dey
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Graeme Dey
Does anybody else want to pick up on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Graeme Dey
We hear you. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Graeme Dey
Good morning. If nothing else, the bill has brought all the issues that we are discussing into sharp focus. That is hugely important, but is the bill the answer? There are criticisms that the draft legislation replicates existing duties. Are we not in danger of simply further congesting the landscape when we need to make real change? If we accept that premise, the question is: if the bill was not in front of us, could we fix the problems effectively and, if we could, what would be the priorities?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Graeme Dey
I will take the questions in a slightly different direction. We have helpfully touched on the gap between the implementation of current policies, duties and intent and the experience of young people and their families. If the witnesses have other examples, we will be delighted to hear them, but I wonder whether we can look at the matter from a slightly different perspective.
I ask the witnesses to imagine that we did not have the bill in front of us and that, after I asked the questions that I have just covered, I asked what could be done to address the matter. What could we do if we did not have the bill? For example, could we ring fence the allocation of funds to support young people through transition? Could we address in some way the point that the transition planning process does not become mandatory until six months before the event? Would it help if we changed the language in legislation from “may” and “shall” to “must”?
Those are just three ideas that I mention for you to think about. I hope that you have many others. Let us imagine that we do not have the bill and are just trying to address some of the horrendous issues that we are hearing about. What would you do?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Graeme Dey
I accept that argument to an extent, but, with respect, the NHS and other entities will always say that, if we gave them more money, they could fix the problem. From what we have heard throughout the meeting, there are some cultural and systemic problems that need to be addressed outwith purely financial resource and what flows from that. Is that not the case?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Graeme Dey
Apologies, convener.
At any stage during the budget process, did any ˿ or parties who have been asking for money for education make such suggestions to you? If they did, how did you assess those suggestions?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Graeme Dey
You chose your words very carefully there—you used phrases such as “I hope to see an improvement”. I take it that you expect progress to be made in the coming year.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Graeme Dey
I have one final question, in the interest of getting a fully balanced picture. In the context of the ambition to recruit another 500 classroom assistants, what progress has been made? For example, we have a growing trend in the identification of pupils with additional support needs. Very often, that is down to improved identification, which is to be welcomed, but classroom assistants can, among other things, provide support in mainstream settings. What progress is there to report in that regard?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Graeme Dey
I do not expect you to have all the figures to hand today, but it would be useful for the committee to hear what the progress on classroom assistants has amounted to. I am certainly also interested in hearing about how you monitor how the £15 million is used and what progress there has been with that. Perhaps you could write to the committee.