The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1342 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
Why is that, Ian? To my knowledge, some construction companies have many more women apprentices than others. What makes the difference between the likes of Ashleigh Building in Ayrshire, which I have come across previously and which often has a lot of women apprentices on site, and others who have none?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
It is good to hear that you are taking on that ambassadorial role, as are your apprentices who have been successful. I hope that others will follow suit in that regard.
Victoria, do you want to come in on those issues?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
So, tackling all of this at source and getting rid of those elements of products right at the very beginning is the way forward. As you construct the route map—the strategy for the future—are you putting together a list of the products that are not up to scratch for sustainability? Are you putting together a list of the legislation that might need to be changed to get rid of those nasty elements? How are you communicating to members of the public that items containing components on that list may not be the right things to buy?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
I do not expect you or your colleagues to know everything about the pollutants in every item, but it must be difficult to put together a circular economy strategy to the level that we want when we are sometimes unaware of the makeup of a particular product.
Let us move on to products where we are aware of such things. My understanding is that persistent organic pollutants—which, of course, can cause harm to human health and the environment—are contained in quite a lot of furniture and that more than 125,000 sofas per year would have to be incinerated in Scotland because of those pollutants. Is that the case? If so, how do we change the ingredients—the components—of products that have those pollutants in them?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
So it is all about plain, understandable language and messaging.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
Before I move to my main line of questioning, I have a quick question. I often wonder whether people play back their committee appearances after they have appeared, because there are sometimes things that I think annoy the general public when we hear from folk. I will give you an example from earlier: there was a machine-gun rattle of acronyms. This may be a question for the chair. Does the board have a policy about using plain, understandable language that the public can get to grips with?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
You gave a politician’s answer there by not really answering the question to my satisfaction and moving on to other subjects. Are you going to put something in place policy-wise so that plain language that is understandable to the public is used rather than acronyms?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
I get your point, but I think that sometimes we complicate things. We want a circular economy, and we want to ensure that we do right for the future. Some of the leading changes over the decades have been consumer led. Why do we not make it simple in some of these cases and point out to consumers via labelling the harmful things that those products contain?
You talk about alternatives, but we already have them. Take microplastics, for example: I understand that many of the leading chewing gum brands are natural products with no microplastics in them. Of course, those products will not need warning labels. By buying them, consumers can help with the circular economy and create a better environment.
Mr Gulland, did you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
That was a very long answer, but basically you are saying, “Yes, let’s tell consumers what is in the products.”
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
Many products have warnings on them. Indeed, cigarettes come with a huge number of warnings on the front of the packet. Should we have warnings on various products? Should we say, for example, that there are microplastics in this chewing gum or organic pollutants in that set of cushions?