łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 8 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1342 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

Why is that, Ian? To my knowledge, some construction companies have many more women apprentices than others. What makes the difference between the likes of Ashleigh Building in Ayrshire, which I have come across previously and which often has a lot of women apprentices on site, and others who have none?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

It is good to hear that you are taking on that ambassadorial role, as are your apprentices who have been successful. I hope that others will follow suit in that regard.

Victoria, do you want to come in on those issues?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

So, tackling all of this at source and getting rid of those elements of products right at the very beginning is the way forward. As you construct the route map—the strategy for the future—are you putting together a list of the products that are not up to scratch for sustainability? Are you putting together a list of the legislation that might need to be changed to get rid of those nasty elements? How are you communicating to members of the public that items containing components on that list may not be the right things to buy?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

I do not expect you or your colleagues to know everything about the pollutants in every item, but it must be difficult to put together a circular economy strategy to the level that we want when we are sometimes unaware of the makeup of a particular product.

Let us move on to products where we are aware of such things. My understanding is that persistent organic pollutants—which, of course, can cause harm to human health and the environment—are contained in quite a lot of furniture and that more than 125,000 sofas per year would have to be incinerated in Scotland because of those pollutants. Is that the case? If so, how do we change the ingredients—the components—of products that have those pollutants in them?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

So it is all about plain, understandable language and messaging.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

Before I move to my main line of questioning, I have a quick question. I often wonder whether people play back their committee appearances after they have appeared, because there are sometimes things that I think annoy the general public when we hear from folk. I will give you an example from earlier: there was a machine-gun rattle of acronyms. This may be a question for the chair. Does the board have a policy about using plain, understandable language that the public can get to grips with?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

You gave a politician’s answer there by not really answering the question to my satisfaction and moving on to other subjects. Are you going to put something in place policy-wise so that plain language that is understandable to the public is used rather than acronyms?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

I get your point, but I think that sometimes we complicate things. We want a circular economy, and we want to ensure that we do right for the future. Some of the leading changes over the decades have been consumer led. Why do we not make it simple in some of these cases and point out to consumers via labelling the harmful things that those products contain?

You talk about alternatives, but we already have them. Take microplastics, for example: I understand that many of the leading chewing gum brands are natural products with no microplastics in them. Of course, those products will not need warning labels. By buying them, consumers can help with the circular economy and create a better environment.

Mr Gulland, did you want to come in?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

That was a very long answer, but basically you are saying, “Yes, let’s tell consumers what is in the products.”

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Zero Waste Scotland

Meeting date: 6 May 2025

Kevin Stewart

Many products have warnings on them. Indeed, cigarettes come with a huge number of warnings on the front of the packet. Should we have warnings on various products? Should we say, for example, that there are microplastics in this chewing gum or organic pollutants in that set of cushions?