The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1000 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
David Torrance
Our next petition is PE2056, which was lodged by Stephen Gauld, and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce legislation providing ministers with the power to call in and potentially override council decisions on the hire of public land for large-scale events.
We last considered the petition at our meeting on 6 March 2024, where we agreed to seek the views of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, the Association for Public Service Excellence in Scotland, Event Scotland, the Scottish Tourism Alliance, and the Scottish Showmen’s Guild, on its ask.
Responses from Event Scotland and the Association for Public Service Excellence are similar to the view that the Scottish Government previously provided to us, which was that local authorities are best placed to make decisions about the hiring and use of public land. Indeed, APSE highlighted that
“such decisions are subject to judicial review ... and ... any disputes regarding decision making would be ... for the court to adjudicate on”.
COSLA responded to let us know that it has “no position” on the matter but suggested that we might want to contact the Society of Local Authority Lawyers and Administrators Scotland for its view.
The Scottish Tourism Alliance responded to say that it believes that
“where there is no sound reason given in refusing the hiring of land for events and there is a clear case that it delivers a positive local, regional, and national economic impact … it would be fair that the Scottish Government could have the power granted to challenge the local authority’s decision”.
The response goes on to state that
“it is important that there is an open and transparent dialogue with local authorities”
and others, including businesses,
“to reach an informed decision if an event is to take place”.
We have also received a submission from the petitioner commenting on the various responses and setting out his view that the hire of public land is separate from council licensing procedures, as they come into effect once permission to hire the land is granted.
Do any members have comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
David Torrance
Thank you, Mr Choudhury. Are colleagues agreed that we will take those actions?
Members indicated agreement.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
David Torrance
Section 15 of the bill describes assistance as providing a terminally ill adult with a substance to end their life, staying with them until they have decided that they wish to use the substance or removing the substance if they decide that they do not wish to use it. The UK bill contains more detail. It says that someone providing assistance may
“prepare that substance for self-administration by that person ... prepare a medical device which will enable that person to self-administer the substance, and ... assist that person to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance.”
We have heard MND Scotland’s concerns on the issue. Why does your bill not define what actions would be considered to constitute self-administration?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. My questions are about the act of assisted dying, the means of death and the substance used.
Some respondents to the committee have raised concerns about complications during assisted dying. Evidence from Oregon has been cited that indicates that 7 to 11 per cent of people have complications during assisted dying, which range from vomiting and waking up to prolonged deaths. On the other hand, in evidence from witnesses from Australia and Canada, the committee has been told that there have been minor complications, such as not being able to get intravenous drips in, but nothing major. How would you address that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
David Torrance
I have no further questions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
David Torrance
The bill states that a doctor or nurse must stay with a person until they have died, but not in the same room. In its evidence, Police Scotland questioned how a health professional could be sure that no third-party involvement was taking place.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
David Torrance
The bill stipulates that an individual’s terminal illness, as opposed to ingestion of a lethal substance associated with assisted dying, would be recorded as a cause of death on the death certificate. Do you have concerns about how that might impact on a death investigation process?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
David Torrance
What is the view of the Scottish Government on the adequacy of the training expectations that are set out in the bill and the financial memorandum?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
David Torrance
I have no further questions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
David Torrance
Has the Scottish Government undertaken its own estimate of costs arising from staff time? Can you detail how they differ from those that are set out in the financial memorandum?