The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1000 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
David Torrance
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
David Torrance
When the committee makes inquiries and takes evidence, we do so to benefit the aims of the petition. I found the statement that Edward Mountain made earlier about the ability of Transport Scotland not helpful at all. It does not help our cause at all when members of the committee make such statements.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
David Torrance
I would like to close the petition under rule 15.7 of the standing orders on the basis that the Justice Committee stage 1 report on the Children (Scotland) Bill stated that it was not persuaded by the presumption in favour of shared parenting, as that could cut across a key principle of the welfare of children being the paramount consideration, and that the Scottish Government agrees with the Justice Committee’s comment on shared parenting. In addition, the Scottish Government works to promote parenting agreements through “Your Parenting Plan”, and work is on-going to resolve family and civil partnership cases more quickly. Furthermore, once fully commenced, the Children (Scotland) 2020 will require the court
“to have regard to any risk of prejudice to the child’s welfare that delay in proceedings would pose.”
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
David Torrance
I am waving them in agreement with you, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
David Torrance
Good morning to the panel members. How can the twin pressures of increased pay and demands for additional staff be balanced in the NHS and in social care within the constraints of the budgets?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
David Torrance
On higher NHS pay, what effect will that have on service delivery if non-staff budgets need to be reduced to fund the increased pay offer?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
David Torrance
What effect might the increase in NHS pay have on service delivery if non-staff budgets need to be reduced to fund the increased pay offer?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
David Torrance
Some of you have touched on workforce recruitment and retention issues already, and I have a question for Jaki Lambert. What particular challenges do nursing and midwifery staff who work in remote and rural areas face?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
David Torrance
My next question is to Michael Dickson; I am conscious of time. What are the additional challenges for ambulance and urgent care staff who work in areas where long distances between services are the norm?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
David Torrance
Considering the evidence before us, I wonder whether we could close the petition, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has clear guidance to support transgender young people in schools as needed. Withdrawing the existence guidance would be detrimental to the wellbeing of transgender young people and would leave teachers and schools without national guidance to inform them and support their decisions. The case review of NHS services provided in England has no significance in the provision of educational materials for schools in Scotland.