The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1000 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
David Torrance
Could the committee write to the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills to request a timeline for the development and publication of the joint action plan on relationships and behaviour in schools, and information about how the Scottish Government expects its call for accurate recording of incidents in schools to be achieved?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
Yes, please.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
Why would the petitioners like to see an inquiry being set up before the conclusion of the Scottish child abuse inquiry?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
What concerns do the petitioners have about the current procedures, statutory duties and national child protection guidance?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider writing to the Scottish Government for an update on whether its delivery plan and timetable for phasing out a sale of horticultural peat will be published and whether it intends to look beyond the sale of peat and consider banning the extraction of peat, but with an exemption for crofters and traditional and cultural use.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
Given the evidence before the committee, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that, based on the evidence currently available, the UK National Screening Committee concluded that it would not recommend a prostate screening programme. Considering that the screening committee will review its recommendation in 12 months’ time, I wonder whether the petitioner would consider bringing the petition back then if he is not happy with the review.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
No, I was considering closing the petition because the screening committee is going to review its decision in 12 months’ time.
12:00Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
Good morning to the cabinet secretary and our other witnesses. Cabinet secretary, can you outline the current governance structure for the A9 dualling programme? What is your role in that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
Cabinet secretary, a colleague touched on this issue earlier. Do you consider the road order process that is used to authorise major road projects to be fit for purpose? If not, do you have any plans to update that process?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
David Torrance
Cabinet secretary, why has a hybrid approach to A9 dualling been adopted? How does the total cost compare with the cost of a capital-funded approach?