The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1000 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
David Torrance
The bill would create an offence relating to behaviour from property within safe access zones that could be seen or heard. What is your opinion on the issue of properties, including churches, that would be in safe access zones?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
David Torrance
Are the fines that will be imposed for breaching the conditions in the safe access zones appropriate? As many of the fines will be paid by well-funded anti-abortion campaigners, will they have the effect of stopping activity in those zones? In relation to human rights, would prison sentences be appropriate for people who continued to offend?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
David Torrance
Good morning to the witnesses. The bill would create an offence relating to behaviour that can be seen or heard from properties in the safe access zones, and we heard in the earlier evidence session that that could cover churches. Do you have any concerns about the extent of the offences and whether they comply with the European convention on human rights?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee might consider writing to the Minister for Children, Young People and Keeping the Promise to recommend that she meet the petitioners to discuss their concerns about unresolved allegations relating to child safeguarding and to ask her what consideration the Scottish Government has given to the suggestion of the Children and Young People鈥檚 Commissioner Scotland to develop a new principle for individual professionals and agencies responsible for child protection issues.
The committee could also consider writing to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman to seek information on the effectiveness of an independent national whistleblowing officer for NHS services and its views on whether a similar approach should be adopted for education and children鈥檚 services.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
Convener, I will withdraw my recommendation.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
Perhaps the committee would like to write to the Lord Advocate seeking an update on the review of diversion from prosecution for sexual offences and make reference to issues raised in this petition as part of any letter to the Minister for Community Safety on PE1947.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
Would the committee consider writing to Transport Scotland to ask how Scotland鈥檚 active travel vision to 2030, the national transport strategy and the road safety improvement fund will work to directly address street clutter, and to ask whether it has considered a national approach to improving the visibility of pedestrian crossings? Perhaps the committee could also consider writing to COSLA to seek information about the capacity of local authorities to widen pavements, reduce street clutter, improve the visibility of pedestrian crossings, enforce the pavement parking ban and implement safe system measures through the road safety improvement fund, and ask how it intends to share best practice on measures to improve pedestrian safety across local authorities.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
Please bear with me, convener, because my response will be quite lengthy.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider writing to the Minister for Victims and Community Safety seeking clear information on what a whole-system approach to youth offending looks like in practice when addressing repeated incidences of violence perpetrated by a young person.
We could ask for that to include details of the varying pathways for responding to repeat perpetrators and what investigation, charging, sentencing, rehabilitation and diversion look like in those pathways; how a history of violent behaviour is considered when addressing youth offending; and how policies and processes across the mental health, education, social care and justice systems work together to put perpetrators on a positive path while protecting victims in their communities.
We could also ask for reflections on whether the minister recognises the challenges to reporting that the petitioner has noted; an indication of whether she recognises the petitioner鈥檚 concern that recorded crime statistics may reflect low reporting rates rather than giving an accurate picture of levels of youth violence; information on what victims can expect by way of transparent communications and trauma informed support at each stage of the process; and, finally, information on what the Scottish Government is doing to address young people using social media to threaten violence or encourage participation in violence.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
David Torrance
Would the committee consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, as the SQA described the appeal process that operated in 2022 as an emergency response for a single year and based its approach for 2023 on the outcome of a full review of the 2022 approach? Also, the use of alternative evidence and appeals raised issues of equitable access, fairness for absent candidates and the volume of work that the service generated for the wider system. Responsibility for the appeals process rests with the SQA, which operates independently from ministers.