The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1043 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
David Torrance
No—I do not.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
David Torrance
I agree with Bill Kidd that we should keep the petition open and I back up his suggestions. I would like to get a legal opinion on the suggestion that ADP must be delivered on a “like for like basis” and that
“any changes which widen eligibility risk DWP deciding that ADP is not a comparable benefit to PIP and withdrawing automatic entitlement to reserved payments from Scottish clients.”
I would like to know whether that is definitely the case.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
David Torrance
This petition has been running for more than seven years. I was there at the beginning of session 4, and I saw it through session 5 and then session 6. We have received more than 100 written, and several oral, submissions. As the convener said, we have also had debates in the Parliament and lots of questions about the issue.
I put on record a big thank you to the petitioners and to all the women who have turned up. It is probably some of the most emotional evidence that I have ever had to take in my time sitting on any committee. I thank the petitioners very much for their perseverance, because we have got a result. Although it has taken a lot of years and perhaps a lot longer than the petitioners would have liked, we have, finally, got a result. I thank them and everybody who has supported them.
I would like to close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
David Torrance
Good morning, cabinet secretary.
In session 5, the Health and Sport Committee reported on the creation of a national digital platform and problems around data sharing. There has been a huge increase in use of technology. Before the pandemic, there were around 1,200 Near Me and video consultations per month; there are now 12,000 per week. What progress is being made on use of a single digital platform and on the problems around data sharing?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
David Torrance
Earlier, you talked to Gillian Mackay about face-to-face consultations with GPs. Is there a guarantee that any individual who wants a face-to-face consultation with any part of the NHS can get one?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
David Torrance
On use of new technologies and platforms, what safeguards have been put in place to protect patient data?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
David Torrance
Bill Kidd has raised a relevant point. If a legal framework and process for overriding the measures already exist, we have no option but to close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders. I have to say, though, that I am very sympathetic to the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
David Torrance
Considering that the Scottish Government plans to lodge secondary legislation and given the work that the Criminal Justice Committee is already doing on a previous petition, we should close the petition under rule 15.7 of the standing orders. If the petitioners are not happy with the outcome, they could bring the petition back in a year’s time.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
David Torrance
I agree that we should keep the petition open. The issue affects rural communities more than any other. Before we do anything else on the petition, we will need to wait and see what is in the national planning framework when it is published. In the meantime, I would like us to write to all the relevant stakeholders to find their views on the petition. There is a whole list of stakeholders here: Heads of Planning Scotland, the Royal Town Planning Institute, Scottish Renewables, Planning Democracy and Planning Aid for Scotland.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
David Torrance
I think that we should act on the recommendation of the Scottish Government and write to the petitioner, asking whether she can bring a specific case forward.