The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 240 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Neil Bibby
You did say that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Neil Bibby
What about informal discussions?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Neil Bibby
You perhaps made the discussions sound more formal than that in your answer to Mr Brown. Are you saying that it was gossip and hearsay?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Neil Bibby
Was the UK Government aware of all the discussions that the Scottish Government had with the EU or with officials from EU member states? You have complained about the UK Government keeping the Scottish Government in the dark in relation to discussions—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Neil Bibby
I have said before that it is not for politicians to make editorial decisions at the BBC, either at a UK or at a Scotland level, but we have questions on value for money, about the BBC meeting its objectives, about fair work and about ensuring Scotland’s TV and film sector is properly invested in.
On the issue of value for money, you mentioned “River City” has an annual budget of £9 million. I understand £1 million of that goes back into BBC Scotland as charges for the production being on the site and for using the studios. It produces 66 30-minute episodes a year with the remaining £8 million, which works out at around £122,000 for each episode. All that is spent in Scotland. “River City”, therefore, costs significantly less to produce than the vast majority of TV dramas. Is that correct?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Neil Bibby
I am not sure that I have seen as much of the marketing as has been suggested.
Ms Valentine, you said that you do not just make programmes for yourself; you make them for the audience. You will be aware that the BBC charter talks about the need
“to reflect, represent and serve the diverse communities of all of the United Kingdom’s nations and regions and, in doing so, support the creative economy across the United Kingdom.”
In the earlier evidence session, we heard from Ofcom about the need for the BBC to do more to engage with working-class audiences. How does scrapping a working-class drama and working-class voices help build support and audience reach for working-class people?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Neil Bibby
I accept that different people will watch different programmes, but this is a soap about a working-class community with working-class voices. I very much welcome more investment in production in Scotland in different areas, but I find it hard to see how that will replicate what exists with “River City”.
In terms of the fair work agenda, you mentioned, Ms Valentine, making sure that the BBC was the best possible place to work. There has been a lot of anger from the cast and crew about the BBC’s decisions around the ending of “River City”. You mentioned that it was an editorial decision, but the cast and crew were told that there was no option to renew the lease for the site and that that was instrumental in ending “River City”.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Neil Bibby
There have been consistent calls on Ofcom and the BBC from the Scottish screen sector to increase the share of production in Scotland. Mr Stewart earlier said that the BBC’s change of tack, announced last week, maybe suggested that it was not adhering to the spirit of Ofcom’s guidance. That is one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it would be that the BBC’s decision suggests that Ofcom’s rules on Scottish qualification have been, to quote you, too flexible to ensure that the projects that the BBC commissions deliver value for money in Scotland. Is that right? Could “too flexible” mean too weak?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Neil Bibby
You mentioned the importance of audiences seeing themselves on screen. In response to Mr Kerr, you talked about the BBC needing to do more to build support among audiences with above-average economic and social needs. Presumably, BBC Scotland cutting a drama like “River City”, which is about a working-class community and voices, will make the situation worse. Have you or will you be looking at that decision?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Neil Bibby
In terms of the number of hours produced, though, “River City”, with its 66 half-hour episodes a year, produces 33 hours. My understanding is that the three new shows, “Grams” “Counsels” and “The Young Team”, will produce only 18 hours of television. “River City” costs significantly less but delivers significantly more content. With the new shows, there will be 15 fewer hours compared with what is currently provided by “River City”.