˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 240 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom-European Union Summit

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Neil Bibby

You did say that.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom-European Union Summit

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Neil Bibby

What about informal discussions?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom-European Union Summit

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Neil Bibby

You perhaps made the discussions sound more formal than that in your answer to Mr Brown. Are you saying that it was gossip and hearsay?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom-European Union Summit

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Neil Bibby

Was the UK Government aware of all the discussions that the Scottish Government had with the EU or with officials from EU member states? You have complained about the UK Government keeping the Scottish Government in the dark in relation to discussions—

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Neil Bibby

I have said before that it is not for politicians to make editorial decisions at the BBC, either at a UK or at a Scotland level, but we have questions on value for money, about the BBC meeting its objectives, about fair work and about ensuring Scotland’s TV and film sector is properly invested in.

On the issue of value for money, you mentioned “River City” has an annual budget of £9 million. I understand £1 million of that goes back into BBC Scotland as charges for the production being on the site and for using the studios. It produces 66 30-minute episodes a year with the remaining £8 million, which works out at around £122,000 for each episode. All that is spent in Scotland. “River City”, therefore, costs significantly less to produce than the vast majority of TV dramas. Is that correct?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Neil Bibby

I am not sure that I have seen as much of the marketing as has been suggested.

Ms Valentine, you said that you do not just make programmes for yourself; you make them for the audience. You will be aware that the BBC charter talks about the need

“to reflect, represent and serve the diverse communities of all of the United Kingdom’s nations and regions and, in doing so, support the creative economy across the United Kingdom.”

In the earlier evidence session, we heard from Ofcom about the need for the BBC to do more to engage with working-class audiences. How does scrapping a working-class drama and working-class voices help build support and audience reach for working-class people?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Neil Bibby

I accept that different people will watch different programmes, but this is a soap about a working-class community with working-class voices. I very much welcome more investment in production in Scotland in different areas, but I find it hard to see how that will replicate what exists with “River City”.

In terms of the fair work agenda, you mentioned, Ms Valentine, making sure that the BBC was the best possible place to work. There has been a lot of anger from the cast and crew about the BBC’s decisions around the ending of “River City”. You mentioned that it was an editorial decision, but the cast and crew were told that there was no option to renew the lease for the site and that that was instrumental in ending “River City”.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Ofcom

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Neil Bibby

There have been consistent calls on Ofcom and the BBC from the Scottish screen sector to increase the share of production in Scotland. Mr Stewart earlier said that the BBC’s change of tack, announced last week, maybe suggested that it was not adhering to the spirit of Ofcom’s guidance. That is one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it would be that the BBC’s decision suggests that Ofcom’s rules on Scottish qualification have been, to quote you, too flexible to ensure that the projects that the BBC commissions deliver value for money in Scotland. Is that right? Could “too flexible” mean too weak?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Ofcom

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Neil Bibby

You mentioned the importance of audiences seeing themselves on screen. In response to Mr Kerr, you talked about the BBC needing to do more to build support among audiences with above-average economic and social needs. Presumably, BBC Scotland cutting a drama like “River City”, which is about a working-class community and voices, will make the situation worse. Have you or will you be looking at that decision?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Neil Bibby

In terms of the number of hours produced, though, “River City”, with its 66 half-hour episodes a year, produces 33 hours. My understanding is that the three new shows, “Grams” “Counsels” and “The Young Team”, will produce only 18 hours of television. “River City” costs significantly less but delivers significantly more content. With the new shows, there will be 15 fewer hours compared with what is currently provided by “River City”.