The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 606 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Mark Griffin
I was going to continue with the line of questioning that I began with the previous panel on the impact on the remainder of services that will be left with councils, but the panel has already covered a lot of that. As a result, I will ask about the impact on local government in its entirety.
We have had police and fire service nationalisation and we are now looking at social work and social care. We have educational regional collaboratives and chat about a national education service. Is this a return to district councils by stealth? Is it appropriate to change the whole landscape of local government in such a piecemeal way, or should we be taking a wider look at local government?
11:30Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Going back to the impact on individual services, I think that I have heard from the panel here in person, but I would like to ask Douglas Hendry to set out the perspective of a rural and island authority, in particular. What will the impact be on the services that are left over? If we go forward with the national care service, what will the impact be on housing, education and leisure in your authority?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Eddie Follan, are you able to touch on child protection?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Mark Griffin
I want to ask about the impact on the council services that would be left behind after a national care service was set up. There are synergies in place in local government and services that work well together by having everyone under one roof. What will be the impact on the services that will be left with local government if this goes ahead? I am thinking specifically of housing and education.
Perhaps Eddie Fraser can respond first, to be followed by Eddie Follan.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Audit Scotland’s response to the call for views says:
“There is a risk of fragmentation of local services”.
Can Carol Calder expand on that and say in which areas the risk is greatest?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Councillor Morrison touched briefly on how the role of a councillor and the responsibilities and burdens on councillors have changed over the past 15 years. Will you expand on that and, given that context of changes, reflect on whether it is even remotely sustainable for councillors to continue on the current levels of pay?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Mark Griffin
I apologise for arriving late, convener, and to you, minister, if you covered this point in your opening statement.
The committee understands that the revised draft of national planning framework 4 is due out shortly. Has there been an analysis of any impact that the bill might have on NPF4 and on the timeframe for approval?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Mark Griffin
We have talked about cultural and financial barriers, and I want to touch on legal barriers as well. Those who work for a local authority are disqualified from standing for election, and there are disqualifications around bankruptcy and other things. Are the disqualifications appropriate? Given the context of the cost of living crisis and interest rates shooting through the roof, councillors could become bankrupt because of the levels of remuneration. Why should someone who has that lived experience be disqualified from becoming a councillor? Why should someone who has the experience of working in, say, a social care setting be disqualified from becoming a councillor, when someone who provides care in the independent sector and is contracted by a council can stand for election?
Particularly in the central belt, some councillors work for local authorities that are right next door, but that is much more difficult to do in island or more rural communities. What are your views on some of the legal disqualifications from standing to be a councillor? Are they appropriate, given that the legislation on that was set out in the 1970s?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Similarly, can you speculate on whether the bill would have any impact on the local authority local development plans that will follow on from NPF4?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Mark Griffin
I agree with the points that have been made so far about how important remuneration is to improving diversity. Is there any evidence out there that we could use to support that view? I am thinking particularly of international evidence. Is there any international evidence that remuneration levels for councillors being set higher leads to increased diversity among candidates and elected councillors?