Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Filter your results Hide all filters
Displaying 1314 contributions
|
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
So, that is wrong; such support is available to all those leaving care prior to the age of 16.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Some of our witnesses expressed concern that there was no clarity about the definitions—that eligibility was not clear. For instance, is the provision available for informal kinship arrangements? There is a lack of clarity on such things. The provisions are very vague, which is why witnesses have raised concerns.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Just to return, a distinction seems to have been drawn between the right to request an assessment and the right to receive support. Why does the bill make that distinction between the two? Why not just say that there is a right to receive support, rather than a right to request an assessment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Why do you not progress that approach?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
I am anxious about that. First of all, on the message that you are sending, if you are saying that this is for those who are most in need and that there is going to be an assessment, it sounds like a filter, rather than just saying that there is a right to receive support. I am anxious about the distinction between the right to request an assessment and the right to receive support. It sounds like a budget-saving measure to limit the amount of support that is provided. Why not just bluntly say, “Everybody will have the right to receive support—full stop”?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Was there consultation with North Yorkshire Council?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Whether the bill has been costed appropriately, whether there is a cliff edge—the fact that we will stop aftercare at a certain age—and whether eligibility is reaching far enough into different types of care-experienced people. I would quite like to address those issues.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
I will ask about aftercare. There is some concern about eligibility, funding and the cliff edge. Could you talk about some of the issues that have been raised and how you would address those concerns about aftercare?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
But does the bill specify that that support has to be provided? Local authorities can do a lot of things—they have the right to do all sorts of things—but are they compelled to provide that support?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
North Yorkshire Council is hailed as an exemplar in the United Kingdom for its right to return and its always here policy, which, simply put, involves aftercare and support. There is no cliff edge: people can get that support throughout their life. They can get support with housing, employment and the whole range of services. Also, in specific circumstances, there is a right to return to care.
Duncan Dunlop, who gave evidence to the committee, specifically stated that North Yorkshire was an example that we should be following, so I am surprised that that was not at least picked up from him, or picked up before that. With a simple search we can find that North Yorkshire has been hailed as a great exemplar. Why are we not drawing on experiences from south of the border?
