The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1057 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Rennie
Will you ask now?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Rennie
You do not always wait to survey members before you express a view.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Rennie
It would be just the way I have asked it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
That is quite interesting. I understand your point about the model being voluntary versus there being another approach, but you are indicating that, if there is an issue of public confidence, perhaps that function could be separated and put into another body.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
I want to follow up on the relationship with ELC and the Care Inspectorate. You said that it was really important to work in partnership. I do not know whether you remember the Care Inspectorate issuing its framework just when HMIE was agreeing with the Care Inspectorate on a joint approach. Do you know how that came about? Have those relationships improved since then?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
That is a change in your position. You previously said that you could not understand how the chair could continue from one to the other.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
Fiona Robertson will have heard comments in previous evidence sessions about the accreditation function sitting with qualifications Scotland. What is your response to those comments?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
I apologise for the direct nature of my question, but it is a question that other people are asking, so I hope that you do not mind me asking it of you, Fiona. Should the leadership of the SQA become the leadership of qualifications Scotland?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Willie Rennie
I suppose that there is a difference between having the right to remain in post and exercising leadership and making a decision about whether you should remain in that post, given the groundswell of demand for change. There is a difference between the two, but I will not ask you to go any further than that.
I want to put on the record that a whole range of organisations have expressed very strong views. Many local authority education officers and heads of education have commented. West Dunbartonshire Council said that
“a wholesale transfer of personnel to Qualifications Scotland would undermine the reform process.â€
Inverclyde Council said that
“the same people will still be involved leading to … the same approach by another name.â€
Moray Council asks:
“How will the current system be different with the same people leading in senior roles?â€
Lots of other organisations are responding in that way. How do you view those responses? Will they affect the decisions that you and your team will make going forward?