Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Filter your results Hide all filters
Displaying 1138 contributions
|
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Report
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
My screen has gone funny.
I understand the point that SNSAs narrowly focus on one capacity and that that needs to change, but there are two separate issues here. The fact is that national monitoring needs to be separate from the assessment process. Am I understanding you correctly that your very clear message to us is that SNSAs are not suitable for national monitoring purposes?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Report
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
The report makes a lot of comment and recommendations about how knowledge is addressed. There is often misunderstanding about what is covered by knowledge, but I note that there is also an issue about how it is addressed in the broad general education and how that should change. In your report, pupils talk about their difficulties in catching up with the knowledge requirements of the senior phase because it has not been covered sufficiently in the broad general education, but the report also identifies a bias in the system towards one of the four capacities鈥攕uccessful learners. Am I correct in saying that there is a tension in that respect? Can you explain a little bit more the issue of knowledge and what needs to be done to address it properly?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Report
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
That is right.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
Minister, your earlier answer was helpful, but is part of the problem not the structure for the provision of the service? You will find that the centres are鈥擺Inaudible.]鈥攁nd sometimes not in every community, so people have to travel quite some distance to access the local nursery or early learning facility. That might be particularly challenging for people who are on low incomes. Have there been any discussions with COSLA and councils about making sure that there is a greater number of centres so that people can access a centre that is more local to them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Report
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
I have one more short question. Does that cause a problem with the connections with further education, higher education and employers? They are used to the current system, with its focus on knowledge, and you are proposing to change that. How do we make sure that it is fully integrated and that we do not have a problem at that end, by solving the problem between BGE and the senior phase?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Report
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
There is a significant debate that we need to have about measurement not just of the overall system to help politicians in the national debate but of what is going on in the classroom, too. Your report makes it quite clear that you think that using the SNSA assessment process鈥擺Inaudible.]鈥攆or broad general education. Following on from Ross Greer鈥檚 questions鈥擺Inaudible.]鈥擲NSAs would not be used for national monitoring purposes. There needs to be a different process.
You have also talked about the separation of the鈥擺Interruption.] I am sorry鈥攕omething has happened.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Report
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
Thank you very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Willie Rennie
Thank you for that explanation, minister. I have no problem with the proposed changes, which I support. However, you will know that uptake of the provision is particularly low across the country, with only about one third of eligible two-year-olds accessing the service. What efforts are being made to increase uptake? There is little point in changing the criteria unless we can deal with the bigger problem of the general low uptake.
