The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1423 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I have a couple of questions about whistleblowers. Specifically, why were so few cases received by the independent national whistleblowing officer? Do you have any thoughts on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
Good morning. Thank you for joining us.
Further to those questions, are you satisfied that the questionnaire and the survey report meet the stated goal of considering the issue of intersectionality in relation to the profile of candidates? Has it been just as difficult to extrapolate data on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
That is helpful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
That is helpful. It would be good to have feedback on that. I take on board what you said about launching the whistleblowing system during the pandemic, but have you looked at whistleblowing systems in other parts of the UK and at whether there is learning to be had from them as well?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
Yes, it is often a complex picture.
This is my final question. In the last session of Parliament, my colleague Margaret Mitchell brought through the Apologies (Scotland) Act 2016. What impact has that potentially had? Given the pandemic, its full potential may not yet have been realised, but I wonder whether that is making it easier for members of the public to receive an apology without having to escalate through complaints systems.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
That is helpful. Thanks very much.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Miles Briggs
Thank you for that. The conclusion is that it will be difficult to read things into the data that we have. Has any work been done on how other countries monitor the diversity of local politicians and candidates? Has there been any learning around that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Miles Briggs
Good morning, panel. Thank you for joining us.
It is my understanding that Lord Brailsford, the new chair of the Scottish public inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, will meet families today. I welcome that. Do you and your organisations feel that Anne’s law has been captured and embedded in the legislation?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Miles Briggs
The first question follows on from Paul McLennan’s question. Last week, we heard from Jim Miller, chair of Heads of Planning Scotland, who suggested that his interpretation of policy 27(d) pointed towards a ban. That is where there has been concern. I saw the minister coming in with a coffee this morning; I do not know whether he used a drive-through to get that. It is important to make sure that, when the policy gets down to local authority level, it is not misinterpreted.
Policy 27 was not even part of the original consultation and there has been no subsequent consultation on it. I was pleased to hear what the minister said to Paul McLennan, but, as for any future consultation on the policy, he said, “This is it”. What will that policy look like in guidance, because that is not clear, given the interpretation that people are taking from NPF4 currently?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Miles Briggs
Good morning to you, minister, and to your officials, and thank you for joining us. You mentioned that NPF4 has been a cross-Government endeavour. I welcome the positive and constructive nature of the discussions that we have had, but I am concerned about where housing sits in NPF4 and the fact that the housing crisis is not necessarily being addressed. I have a few specific questions on that. How does the revised NPF4 address the issue of potential underdelivery of land in the pipeline? Is there any trigger in place if land is not being brought forward?