The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1423 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
It suggests to me that there had been concerns about the university鈥檚 finances in previous years.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
It is not meant to be. I am only wondering what your relationship is with the organisation, as you were reporting to it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
In your time at the university, were you aware of the duty that you had to report to the Funding Council? Had you made sure that you were acutely aware of what your duties were?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
I assume that that is the same for the other witnesses.
On the potential financial health checks, had any of you expressed concern among yourselves about organisations that should have been coming to the university to look at that and whether they had been directly involved? There seems to have been financial mismanagement throughout the organisation, as shown in the Gillies report and the evidence that we have received.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
Were you aware of the reporting mechanisms that the university should have had and that the court should also have been aware of?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
The SFC is meant to be doing that financial health check for the university sector, so it is concerning that it is not getting that information; some of the relationships are concerning as well.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
I want to return to something that you said, Mr Fotheringham. You mentioned that there had been finance resilience issues on previous occasions. What did you mean by that and what timescale did you mean?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
In answer to some of the questions on court members and the information that you gave to them, you said that the university had previously experienced financial resilience issues. What did you mean by that and which period were you talking about?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
Okay. Thank you. How would you describe your relationship with individuals at the Scottish Funding Council? That question is to both of you, Mr Fotheringham and Dr McGeorge.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Miles Briggs
You do not seem to have a close relationship with the SFC, Mr Fotheringham, so was it purely transactional, with you providing that information? In the report, the SFC is quite scathing, but that is post any opportunity for it to have known earlier.
Given the email that you sent, Dr McGeorge, you seem to have developed a close, friendly relationship. Did that mean that you felt that you could not or did not need to provide the SFC with all the information on time that the SFC now says it never received?
12:15