The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1366 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Further to my question, the recent Scottish Commission on Social Security report on adult disability payments recommended a focus on active referrals, rather than just signposting, as the way forward. Will a key part of the strategy to develop pathways be to actively refer people and not just signpost them?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
With that in mind, why has the Government decided not to include targets for uptake in the strategy, which could drive forward uptake of all the new benefits? What is the rationale behind that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Part of the discussion that we had on last Monday’s visit to Social Security Scotland was about groups that might find it difficult to access or fill out forms, or that have technology challenges. On the people who are not applying, what work has been done on identifying whether those are the key reasons for people not wanting to fill out huge numbers of forms? Are there also language or reading barriers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Miles Briggs
No. Both my questions have been answered, so I am happy to move on.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Good morning to the panel. My questions are about the workload for assessors and valuation committees. First, will you outline your thoughts on the potential implications for that workload and the system if we allow coronavirus-related MCC appeals? I ask Alastair Kirkwood to comment first, and then Charles Golding. If anyone else wants to comment, they should type the letter R in the chat box.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Good morning. I want to ask about the practicalities of reviewing valuations each time that coronavirus legislation or guidance is amended. Do you want to add anything from your experience in that regard?
I do not know whether you had the chance to listen to the evidence of the previous panel of witnesses, but we heard that there are likely to be 130,000 potential appeals. What are your views on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Miles Briggs
No, convener, thank you. My questions have been answered and I am happy to hand over to the next member.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Miles Briggs
I have a question about temporary accommodation and I will ask for your input on trends in relation to the individuals that we are talking about. Findings from the “Hard Edges Scotland” research by Heriot-Watt University show the complex needs of those individuals and that they often fall through the gaps of services.
From my five years as an MSP trying to help such people, I know that they are often ex-military, people with learning disability issues or people with drug and alcohol problems. Do you have any evidence that you could provide the committee with about individuals who seem to be constantly in temporary council accommodation? Should we consider different models, such as a supported living model when individuals cannot hold down a tenancy?
Having referenced the “Hard Edges Scotland” research, I will bring in Dr Watts first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Perhaps we can bring in Maggie Brünjes here.
On the point that Beth Watts has raised and on one of the issues that is important to note, we have already heard that nine local authorities—or at least seven—are likely to be in breach of the unsuitable accommodation order. What accommodation is there for the individuals whom we are talking about? I know from a visit that I undertook last Friday in my region that there are more than 50 people in Edinburgh with alcoholic brain damage who are currently on waiting lists to get into supported living. That accommodation does not necessarily seem to be in existence currently.
On the support that people need, wraparound care is expensive, and the workforce is not necessarily there. I turn to Maggie Brünjes now. What should the committee suggest to the Government needs to be put in place for that group? My experience is that people often end up pinging around services, sadly. What, in your expert opinion, could be a solution for that cohort of clients?
On that note, we have lost you, Maggie.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Miles Briggs
Yes.