The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5976 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
The only comment that I would make before I hand back to the convener is that a lot can change in 12 years—not just views on COSLA—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
—but views on election expenses. I am sure that the minister accepts that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
Perhaps you could help me out, minister. I want to find out a bit more about the spending limits. The expenses limit of £740 is being increased. When was that limit put in place, and when was that sum last reviewed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
As I had hoped. [Laughter.] Maybe that is something to do with the broadcasting team.
I was asking about the £740 expenses limit, which has been reviewed. When was that amount set, and when was it last reviewed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
I suspect that it has been some time since you were a councillor, minister, but how many councillors were asked whether they thought that the spending limits were correct, and did that happen in every geographical area? It is much easier to deliver leaflets in your area than it is in, say, the north of Scotland, where there are huge geographical areas to cover. How many councillors were asked and what were their opinions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
Thank you, minister. How did you come up with the £66 figure? The figure is bizarre—it is an 8.918 per cent increase. How did you work it out?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
If the increase is based purely on inflation, I am not sure how, even in calculating a cumulative inflation figure for the period, we would arrive at that figure.
The next election will be very different to previous elections because of Covid. I still believe that a lot more will have to be done remotely. I have argued the point before that, when it comes to parliamentary elections, there has been a huge shift from hand deliveries to postal deliveries. Do you think that the £66 increase is sufficient, given that it has probably already been accepted that the increase in the expenses limits for parliamentary elections will need to be bigger than the amount that would be delivered through a formulaic increase that is based on inflation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
You have answered the question that I was going to ask about how to reach out and include everyone who is suffering from long Covid. How will you make people who are suffering aware of all that you are trying to do? The group’s aim is very laudable, and it will be breaking new ground. You have partly answered my question, but I would appreciate it if you could give me a bit more information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2021
Edward Mountain
I will try to articulate my concern more clearly. Paragraph 4.18 states:
“I have a registrable interest where I own or have any other right or interest in houses, land and buildings”.
You will be aware that ˿ do not have to register their private houses or record them in their entry in the register of members’ interests. I wonder whether that specific matter might cause confusion to people on public bodies. They might feel that they have to register their private houses, which goes beyond what ˿ are requested to do.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2021
Edward Mountain
I think that Bob Doris has a question, too, convener.
My only concern about this is the emphasis on declaring one’s private residence, which we ˿ do not have to do. It would be useful to remove one’s private residence from the requirement to bring things into line with what we do and to make everything equitable and fair.