The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5980 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 105 disagreed to.
Amendment 106 not moved.
Amendment 107 moved—[Bob Doris].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 417 disagreed to.
Amendment 348 not moved.
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Before I come to the cabinet secretary, I will say that, as a farmer, I am not frightened of producing a land management plan—I am very happy to do it. However, I want to point out some of the problems that farmers face in drawing up a land management plan. As a farmer, I have no idea what I will be doing in two years’ time. I have no idea what the Government wants me to do with the subsidy system in two years’ time. If my landholding was big enough to have a land management plan, I could not come up with one, because I do not know whether the cattle that I have would be something that the Government wants. The Climate Change Committee is talking about a reduction of 33 per cent in cattle numbers, which means that I might not be able to have those cattle. I do not have sheep but, if I did, I might not be able to have those sheep. Although I have barley, I might not even know whether distilleries want the barley in two years’ time. It is very difficult to come up with a land management plan for five years.
I see that Monica Lennon wants to come in, but I will take Mr Ruskell first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Tim Eagle to speak to amendment 407 and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Experience has taught me that, when a landowner signs up to a land management plan, if there is criticism of their objectives and actions, bodies such as NatureScot—Scottish Natural Heritage, as was—run for the hills rather than supporting the land management plan that they signed up to. A land management plan has to work both ways. Once it is signed up and agreed to, it must be supported not only by the landowner, who has developed it in conjunction with the community, but by the community that signed up to it taking part in it and the Government bodies that have asked for it. It needs to be progressive.
The committee heard views on the costings of land management plans. We heard from one witness who suggested that it might cost £60,000 to produce a land management plan, but we thought that that was particular to a specific area, and that land management plans would be graduated in cost. We also heard from two land agents who suggested that £10,000 to £15,000 for a 1,000-hectare estate farm would be relevant.
My concern is that the level of community engagement that might be required is still not bottomed out. Maybe that is something for stage 3. Community engagement can take a considerable amount of time. I gave the example of Glen Prosen. Three years after the Scottish Government purchased it for the people of Scotland, we still do not have a land management plan for it, because community engagement is occurring. It might appear in the next week as a result of this conversation, but I doubt it. It is going to take a considerable amount of time.
I would like to see more bottoming out of the idea, and I would like to work with the cabinet secretary on what community engagement means. If we can get community engagement right, and resolve the issue of the depth of and requirements in the land management plan, they should not necessarily frighten people who are taking part.
I would be grateful if the cabinet secretary could wind up and perhaps agree with everything that I have said—but maybe she will not.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
It is up to you, Mr Eagle, whether you want to take an intervention, but your enthusiasm may preclude it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I ask Tim Eagle to speak to amendment 418 and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
That is correct, and local place plans were also raised at some stages during our evidence.