The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5978 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 174A disagreed to.
Amendment 174B moved鈥擺Mercedes Villalba].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 174B be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I ask Mark Ruskell to wind up and indicate whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 374.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that your point is right. The aim of grouse moor licensing was to address what was perceived to be a problem with the persecution of raptors, and I accept that raptor persecution is wrong. The trouble is that the licensing has hardly been going for the two shakes of a dog鈥檚 tail; it has just come in. We have not seen whether it has had any effect and you already want to change it. I do not understand what your justification is for that. Perhaps there is evidence that I have missed. What has changed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Are you saying that you will not press it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Before I call the next amendment, I want to be clear that, as a farmer, I am often approached by energy companies to put pylon lines over my land. I am currently being forced, under threat of a compulsory purchase order, to take a pylon line over my farm, which interrupts my business for the benefit of another鈥檚 business. I want to put that on the record so that people are aware of it.
I welcome Ben Macpherson to the committee. Good morning. You were previously a full member of the committee and are currently a substitute member. I ask you to speak to amendment 471 and the other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
It is just morning; it is almost afternoon.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 141 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 364 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)